From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC92385043C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:14:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3CC92385043C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mliska@suse.cz X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6176CAE68; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use vec::reserve before vec_safe_grow_cleared is called To: Richard Biener Cc: GCC Patches , Jan Hubicka References: <8bf8b90a-6d10-90e3-62aa-633f7bbf71be@suse.cz> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: <34bd3626-39c0-2516-208d-0ebf5a736b1c@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:14:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 07:14:14 -0000 On 7/27/20 9:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > OK. I guess the previous code tried to use less memory. It did. But I didn't realize that such exact growth would lead to a massive reallocation for huge apps like chromium. I'm going to backport the patch older releases as well. Martin