public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Burnus <tburnus@baylibre.com>
To: Andrew Stubbs <ams@baylibre.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch][RFC] GCN: Define ISA archs in gcn-devices.def and use it
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:56:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34ce2f18-2b91-4545-9a62-f3d8612ab43a@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cd79abd-d764-4ff3-96a7-cac6f08e2de4@baylibre.com>

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This is more-or-less what I was planning to do myself, but as I want 
> to include all the other features that get parametrized in gcn.cc, 
> gcn.h, gcn-hsa.h, gcn-opts.h, I hadn't got around to it yet. 
> Unfortunately, I think the gcn.opt and config.gcc will always need 
> manually updating, but if that's all it'll be an improvement.

Well, for .opt see how nvptx does it – it actually generates an .opt file.

> I don't like the idea of including AMDGPU_ISA_UNSUPPORTED;

I concur – I was initially thinking of reporting the device name 
("Unsupported %s") but I then realized that the agent returns a string 
while only for GCC generated files (→ eflag) the hexcode is used. Thus, 
I ended up not using it.

> Ultimately, I want to replace many of the conditionals like 
> "TARGET_CDNA2_PLUS" from the code and replace them with feature flags 
> derived from a def file, or at least a header file. We've acquired too 
> many places where there are unsearchable conditionals that need 
> finding and fixing every time a new device comes along.
I was thinking of having more flags, but those where the only ones 
required for the two files.
> I had imagined that this .def file would exist in gcc/config/gcn, but 
> you've placed it in libgomp.... maybe it makes sense to have multiple 
> such files if they contain very different data, but I had imagined one 
> file and I'm not sure that the compiler definitions live in libgomp.

There is already:

gcc/config/darwin-c.cc:#include "../../libcpp/internal.h"

gcc/config/gcn/gcn-run.cc:#include 
"../../../libgomp/config/gcn/libgomp-gcn.h"

gcc/fortran/cpp.cc:#include "../../libcpp/internal.h"

gcc/fortran/trigd_fe.inc:#include "../../libgfortran/intrinsics/trigd.inc"

But there is also the reverse:

libcpp/lex.cc:#include "../gcc/config/i386/cpuid.h"

libgfortran/libgfortran.h:#include "../gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h"

lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c:#include "../gcc/lto/common.h"

If you add more items, it is probably better to have it under 
gcc/config/gcn/ - and I really prefer a single file for all.

* * *

Talking about feature sets: This would be a bit like LLVM (see below) 
but I think they have a bit too much indirections. But I do concur that 
we need to consolidate the current support – and hopefully make it 
easier to keep adding more GPU support; we seem to have already covered 
a larger chunk :-)

I also did wonder whether we should support, e.g., running a gfx1100 
code (or a gfx11-generic one) on, e.g., a gfx1103 device. Alternatively, 
we could keep the current check which requires an exact match.

BTW: I do note that looking at the feature sets in LLVM that all GFX110x 
GPUs seem to have common silicon bugs: FeatureMSAALoadDstSelBug and 
FeatureMADIntraFwdBug, while 1100 and 1102 additionally have the 
FeatureUserSGPRInit16Bug but 1101 and 1103 don't. — For some reasons, 
FeatureISAVersion11_Generic only consists of two of those bugs (it 
doesn't have FeatureMADIntraFwdBug), which doesn't seem to be that 
consistent. Maybe the workaround has issues elsewhere? If so, a generic 
-march=gfx11 might be not as useful as one might hope for.

* * *

If I look at LLVM's 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.td 
,

they first define several features – like 'FeatureUnalignedScratchAccess'.

Then they combine them like in:

def FeatureISAVersion11_Common ... [FeatureGFX11, ... 
FeatureAtomicFaddRtnInsts ...

And then they use those to map them to feature sets like:

def FeatureISAVersion11_0_Common ... 
listconcat(FeatureISAVersion11_Common.Features,
     [FeatureMSAALoadDstSelBug ...

And for gfx1103:

def FeatureISAVersion11_0_3 : FeatureSet<
   !listconcat(FeatureISAVersion11_0_Common.Features,
     [])>;

The mapping to gfx... names then happens in 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/GCNProcessors.td 
such as:

def : ProcessorModel<"gfx1103", GFX11SpeedModel,
   FeatureISAVersion11_0_3.Features
 >;

Or for the generic one, i.e.:

// [gfx1100, gfx1101, gfx1102, gfx1103, gfx1150, gfx1151]
def : ProcessorModel<"gfx11-generic", GFX11SpeedModel,
   FeatureISAVersion11_Generic.Features

LLVM also has some generic flags like the following in 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/TargetParser/TargetParser.cpp

     {{"gfx1013"},   {"gfx1013"}, GK_GFX1013, 
FEATURE_FAST_FMA_F32|FEATURE_FAST_DENORMAL_F32|FEATURE_WAVE32|FEATURE_XNACK|FEATURE_WGP},

I hope that this will give some inspiration – but I assume that at least 
the initial implementation will be much shorter.

Tobias


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-15 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-15 12:21 Tobias Burnus
2024-03-15 13:14 ` Andrew Stubbs
2024-03-15 13:56   ` Tobias Burnus [this message]
2024-03-15 16:35     ` Andrew Stubbs
2024-03-18  7:47       ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34ce2f18-2b91-4545-9a62-f3d8612ab43a@baylibre.com \
    --to=tburnus@baylibre.com \
    --cc=ams@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).