From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B21E638708A4 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B21E638708A4 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B21E638708A4 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718679333; cv=none; b=LV+uGgVqtIvN6cxloBU5kX/VqyaxfQHd86NXAqUPh2JTLn0kUWnaNLChoSY0QYtBeoSPcFqhtP33HAbk7Lf97CJNGi8MLIPjQEezPW7N9I2F3tokD5gzaObvgt4C6UaFemw5c/m3FBCnDdThPL8wDn9RUDP0dFQ7eAID9FxWKk0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718679333; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nr1xLWuOu5X7DeL28m6OT0bvhYmngfR7/qew8LR+ydI=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=BI76bohYGBDWpZ3zihVsiivYd61ovRLBv7K4adBjDyGXfTJ9fd2uYzS47v1o1mFHhp+Nh0xPrRv7w4uzdVlBovpoqpbOimvqbE6JxH3FazDmBe92pzQDBEgooFyW5cgqIqLUl0dWVO5+Ztsg9WXCoP7/Q71aKwJVTDj2x0Kpyfc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 45I2Pkkj021868; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:31 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h= message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references:from :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=r FyI5XtXbI1Mf0tLdmZbljCtansMNh/dMxdql0ySki4=; b=iQYhR9sVwqtkqHsUh jnPgZYHKWGJ1nNp9LMOpkpGT+wkTeSDlTCKQXvEZos9mJ1N8Pi9/G37v4jCE33mv 7rp64I/6IPIiCo4uybfeQPDRKfSuDYOIz3GASAJ3HJvArVtxe46LqKZT6+uEhgCy uiJ9SoID0yAhtcVuhoXkLZGzyQimMOmex20DpD4695+Hij0i82B4bLBsMMb37jzN 3vaU5zgSYH200XVuKV6542sxI3SIBrX9VJY4b6JAnXvssEtgs09bLObwuMaZR/JX MVY0VNN5CGiBtOudqL7+hzWjsmU2AfIpq3g7RjVUihlbamsAtbon9FzNFbbhOGQq y/SpQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ytxyxgc62-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 45I2spF7031500; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:30 GMT Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ytxyxgc5w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 45I1UMa1006189; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:29 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ysn9ufe1x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:29 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 45I2tQBE57410044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:28 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A30F20043; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CA420040; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.200.158.244] (unknown [9.200.158.244]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:55:24 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <356895aa-2c5f-4e09-5e6a-dd17225333ca@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:55:23 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Compute rop_hash_save_offset for non-Altivec compiles [PR115389] Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Bergner Cc: GCC Patches , Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn References: <4a8bf020-b15f-3929-6a13-6c0981784895@linux.ibm.com> <544eb6de-906d-4c25-8dbb-422c5bf6fef2@linux.ibm.com> <4ebe6713-dfd0-4370-a98c-f31386154483@linux.ibm.com> <4900df24-e3ff-4036-87f6-fc364fb872cf@linux.ibm.com> <6c0c6bfa-e903-4c29-a684-ce03b7e49fbd@linux.ibm.com> From: "Kewen.Lin" In-Reply-To: <6c0c6bfa-e903-4c29-a684-ce03b7e49fbd@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: sbvTzQZEIjDWiOJPB-Azh8-QC4bmHC8b X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ye5rcnVyJFHWB-pFDT47U8maIrijozEd X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-06-17_14,2024-06-17_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=640 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2405170001 definitions=main-2406180021 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: on 2024/6/17 20:57, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 6/16/24 9:40 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> on 2024/6/17 10:31, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> On 6/16/24 9:10 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote: >>>> on 2024/6/15 01:05, Peter Bergner wrote: >>>>> That said, the --with-cpu=power5 build without fortran did bootstrap and >>>>> regtest with no regressions, so the build did test that code path and >>>>> exposed no problems. >>>> >>>> OK, nice! Thanks! >>> >>> I assume this means you're "OK" with the updated patch, correct? >> >> Yes, OK for trunk, thanks! > > Thanks. We will need backports to GCC 11, as it is broken back to when > ROP was first added then. I'll let things burn-in on trunk for a couple > of days so Bill's CI builders have a chance to test it on all of our > configs. OK for backporting too (if you still need an explicit OK). Thanks! BR, Kewen