From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94889 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2018 20:57:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94875 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2018 20:57:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:57:22 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA51F81250; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-22.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB3260180; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [Patch] Document __builtin_extend_pointer To: Tom de Vries , sellcey@cavium.com Cc: gcc-patches , "richard.earnshaw" References: <1519147981.6296.18.camel@cavium.com> <6a8f42af-7413-5b55-2bd9-09244cca36ab@mentor.com> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <35cfdf8c-9006-d9f2-bd45-63196c063dd7@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 21:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6a8f42af-7413-5b55-2bd9-09244cca36ab@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 On 03/20/2018 06:08 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 02/20/2018 06:33 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: >> +@deftypefn {Built-in Function} Pmode __builtin_extend_pointer (void * x) >> +On targets where the user visible pointer size is different than the >> size >> +of an actual hardware address this function returns the extended user >> +pointer.  Targets where this is true included ILP32 mode on x86_64 or >> +Aarch64.  This function is mainly useful when writing inline assembly >> +code. >> +@var{addr} >> +@end deftypefn > > Hi, > > I think the "@var{addr}" bit is a pasto. Agreed. And a patch to remove the pasto is pre-approved. jeff