From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 85903 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2020 19:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85891 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2020 19:41:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*F:D*eu, H*r:sk:server2, H*RU:sk:server2, HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:server2 X-HELO: server28.superhosting.bg Received: from server28.superhosting.bg (HELO server28.superhosting.bg) (217.174.156.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:41:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dinux.eu; s=default; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=53db4E/or8cbP+fRf5xSCOTCiwaug1SKs7Lkox2kjEg=; b=XsH+Y0upOxVMecvQVoRXPc4yfn rFmAQy8XJEh6kDfrtrsgibCJ/EQpZ67GTB6iROF8i2/EoUbRXraLNz+wTPkeXvqdQALcY6Oi/IhOL sczO7yVHXs5NrRIc1z7WAazul/SRSg5kfdCGBph7I6jAjS8k7uA2FznsFWVpA2jd+q4/Jxor3EFNY zbZwqAnmiM0JFoclw4g8earF8JGns8ufU71xa3ZOLlNfQdJx2y9AonAhbe2BH8bcNLMBGTxhnT5z1 m2lfDwJsOHbLBxq9DiCN/3NLD4V23Cn0CyBQT5nEWVdq4OaaCepIl0UWUhjjY4G4dwyHvuEG98NtX 3Sq4xDHQ==; Received: from [95.87.234.74] (port=34902 helo=tpdeb.localnet) by server28.superhosting.bg with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iroXM-000Beo-EO; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:41:10 +0200 From: Dimitar Dimitrov To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Rainer Orth , David Malcolm , Richard Biener , jakub@redhat.com, law@redhat.com Subject: Re: Analyzer committed to master (was Re: Analyzer status) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3697979.zczqHaP2R5@tpdeb> In-Reply-To: References: <20200113221024.29991-1-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <4bbd51112b4b99f240dee1e400a30d8d55c38ec0.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00907.txt.bz2 On Wed, 15.01.2020, 14:30:43 EET Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi David, > > > I've rebased and squashed the analyzer patch kit and squashed patch 2 > > of the hash_table fix into it, and re-tested it successfully, so I've > > pushed it to master (as 757bf1dff5e8cee34c0a75d06140ca972bfecfa7). > > > > I'm going to work through the various followup patches I had on my > > branch and re-test and push to master those that seem appropriate. > > I'm seeing quite a number of failures on Solaris (both sparc and x86), > but also some on 32-bit Linux/x86: > > Running target unix/-m32 > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 610) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 611) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 615) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 616) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 657) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 658) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 662) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 663) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 705) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 706) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 710) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 711) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 753) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 754) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 758) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for warnings, line 759) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/data-model-1.c (test for excess errors) > I see those errors on PRU and AVR backends. Regards, Dimitar