From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: pan2.li <pan2.li@intel.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>, pan2.li <pan2.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE non-vector in TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:11:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36B27ED56FE33E73+202404121411218680130@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240412060856.1331060-1-pan2.li@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4085 bytes --]
LGTM。
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: pan2.li
Date: 2024-04-12 14:08
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; Pan Li
Subject: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Bugfix ICE non-vector in TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
From: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
This patch would like to fix one ICE when vector is not enabled
in hook TARGET_FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P implementation. The vector
regno is available if and only if the TARGET_VECTOR is true. The
previous implement missed this condition and then result in ICE
when rv64gc build option without vector.
PR target/114639
The below test suite is passed for this patch.
* The rv64gcv fully regression tests.
* The rv64gc fully regression tests.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_function_value_regno_p): Add
TARGET_VECTOR predicate for V_RETURN regno.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c | 11 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c | 11 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c | 11 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c | 11 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 91f017dd52a..e5f00806bb9 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -11008,7 +11008,7 @@ riscv_function_value_regno_p (const unsigned regno)
if (FP_RETURN_FIRST <= regno && regno <= FP_RETURN_LAST)
return true;
- if (regno == V_RETURN)
+ if (TARGET_VECTOR && regno == V_RETURN)
return true;
return false;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f41723193a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* Test that we do not have ice when compile */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc -mabi=lp64d -std=gnu89 -O3" } */
+
+g (a, b) {}
+
+f (xx)
+ void* xx;
+{
+ __builtin_apply ((void*)g, xx, 200);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0c402c4b254
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* Test that we do not have ice when compile */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64imac -mabi=lp64 -std=gnu89 -O3" } */
+
+g (a, b) {}
+
+f (xx)
+ void* xx;
+{
+ __builtin_apply ((void*)g, xx, 200);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ffb0d6d162d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* Test that we do not have ice when compile */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc -mabi=ilp32d -std=gnu89 -O3" } */
+
+g (a, b) {}
+
+f (xx)
+ void* xx;
+{
+ __builtin_apply ((void*)g, xx, 200);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a6e229101ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114639-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* Test that we do not have ice when compile */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32imac -mabi=ilp32 -std=gnu89 -O3" } */
+
+g (a, b) {}
+
+f (xx)
+ void* xx;
+{
+ __builtin_apply ((void*)g, xx, 200);
+}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-12 6:08 pan2.li
2024-04-12 6:11 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2024-04-12 6:18 ` Li, Pan2
2024-04-12 8:55 ` Kito Cheng
2024-04-12 10:57 ` Li, Pan2
2024-04-13 1:32 ` Li, Pan2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36B27ED56FE33E73+202404121411218680130@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=pan2.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).