public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, WANG Xuerui <i@xen0n.name>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: xuchenghua@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: document -m[no-]explicit-relocs
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 17:28:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <36e9d5fa-3742-7dbb-1dbe-78345b4a0709@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5865935a56759df13855f3a9f9aff6396e79191b.camel@xry111.site>


在 2022/7/27 下午5:15, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 16:47 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
>
>>>   "Use or do not use assembler relocation operators when dealing with
>>> symbolic addresses. The alternative is to use assembler macros
>>> instead, which may limit optimization.
>>>   
>>>   The default value for the option is determined during GCC build-
>>> time by detecting corresponding assembler support: @code{-mexplicit-
>>> relocs} if said support is present, @code{-mno-explicit-relocs}
>>> otherwise. This option is mostly useful for debugging, or
>>> interoperation with assemblers different from the build-time one."
>>>   
>> I agree with wangxuerui's idea.
>> The same parameter and the same description information can reduce the
>> user's time to learn how to use this parameter.
> I agree it's better than my origin paragraph.
>
> If you agree I'll commit it with Xuerui as the commit author.
>

I have no opinion if wangxuerui agrees.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27  7:06 Xi Ruoyao
2022-07-27  7:21 ` WANG Xuerui
2022-07-27  8:47   ` Lulu Cheng
2022-07-27  9:15     ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-07-27  9:28       ` Lulu Cheng [this message]
2022-07-27  9:57         ` WANG Xuerui
2022-07-27 13:18           ` Xi Ruoyao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=36e9d5fa-3742-7dbb-1dbe-78345b4a0709@loongson.cn \
    --to=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=i@xen0n.name \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).