From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2990D385802D for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:52:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2990D385802D Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d27so17451962wrb.6 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:52:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DUvd7gVtw5f4Pa0GJUZ0QdZNq6gExHY7LM8tN4PAgn4=; b=SNDmV/N/zU0UXVMhejRSHpTLYGVDU73d150cUbYsGkCEE3lcI+jwIuhYlSTgupnfKM gjH6jJ4FkyHc8RnhIL0D5UmRxqvtAPv2KO0p5a27qC7xR8+kVBriEoE/5GBsTYbvrEbv X0MvJ0hJCiSj2dOn/tdFuW3eOSUutuh7+QUwqxQoe4IvQ5BqiiQpyp5/M5eStG9urhUS cU2p3KB06s39kTZFwbD4bttm9TbwSQ0YojAqLwjQ2Gez2ftJ/3teeDVKSWvEfJjk63OQ f+ILqvVBIc/0qhJXjQq5DS4/3++tkoomsKw6mVAX/ku/j3gHw7wM2wTiyhsyrgVaxHim 9OZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QLYIEX2QvaqSVjPwaGzdUxUHNpwPKWXxPV7ENOVRYcJT8dZKz J5gNjQP+fnMSgjUiBauheGM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXM+cCMnRpY3LGiE5P2L2GAEEMuIYZQpt3djto7W9jjLrTIfAmhLdFpy2s6CU9u5wBcGNP9A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58ed:: with SMTP id f13mr21199423wrd.373.1636746725966; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:52:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dynamic-095-118-045-251.95.118.pool.telefonica.de. [95.118.45.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm16468683wmq.34.2021.11.12.11.52.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:52:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 20:52:04 +0100 From: Richard Biener To: "H.J. Lu" CC: "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= , Hongtao Liu , Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> Message-ID: <381055F0-2DE9-419A-BFB7-206339872C9E@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:52:18 -0000 On November 12, 2021 8:18:59 PM GMT+01:00, "H=2EJ=2E Lu" wrote: >On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:15 AM Richard Biener > wrote: >> >> On November 12, 2021 3:41:41 PM GMT+01:00, "H=2EJ=2E Lu via Gcc-patches= " wrote: >> >On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Li=C5=A1ka w= rote: >> >> >> >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Li=C5=A1ka wrote= : >> >> >>> This fixes issue reported in the PR=2E >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Ready to be installed? >> >> >> I'm not sure=2E liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the ri= ght >> >> >> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, no= thing >> >> >> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed = away >> >> >> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel f= ix it in >> >> >> their source and update from that=2E >> >> >> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream=2E >> >> > I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the= case that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code=2E >> >> > >> >> > jeff >> >> >> >> @H=2EJ=2E ? >> >> >> > >> >We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12=2E We will remove all tr= aces of >> >MIC offload in GCC 13=2E >> >> Can you document that in gcc-12/changes=2Ehtml in the caveats section p= lease? >> > >I will do that=2E > >Can you review my last wwwdocs change: > >https://gcc=2Egnu=2Eorg/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578344=2Ehtml That change is OK=2E=20 Richard=2E=20 >Thanks=2E >