public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "Lynn A. Boger" <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (1/4)
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3829112.V2J7CgNQDA@polaris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOyqgcV5TEZVFaA74cd_1AHFX9faoXbHLJwyY-wDKVWjK_xrRw@mail.gmail.com>

> > Btw, Ian, if the heap trampoline support is no longer used by the Go
> > compiler, you might want to remove it from the middle-end.
> 
> Yes, I suppose so.  The Go frontend hasn't used them for a while.

Speaking of obsolete stuff, do you have any opinion on the below patch?
  https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01586.html

-- 
Eric Botcazou

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-07  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-04 20:10 [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:12 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (1/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-12 19:41   ` Jeff Law
2016-09-12 19:45   ` Jeff Law
2016-12-05 20:52   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 21:29     ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-05 22:41       ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 22:12     ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 17:52       ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 20:18         ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-06 21:59           ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-06 22:26             ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07 13:38               ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-07 13:56                 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07  7:23           ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2017-03-23 16:48   ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-28 17:01     ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-29 10:05       ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-29 14:05         ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-29 14:15           ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-04 20:14 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (2/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:15 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (3/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-05 10:52   ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-12 19:56   ` Jeff Law
2016-09-04 21:31 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (4/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-16 20:29 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 10:40   ` Andreas Schwab
2016-10-17 11:14     ` Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 22:35     ` Eric Botcazou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3829112.V2J7CgNQDA@polaris \
    --to=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=iant@golang.org \
    --cc=laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).