From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] complex type canonicalization
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <384ed945-83b4-b421-ab82-92b5e236d874@acm.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1504 bytes --]
This patch fixes PR 83187, a C++ ICE with alias sets. As Jakub observed
in the bug, we ended up with a type whose main variant's canonical
type's main variant was not itself. That should be an invariant.
In build_complex_type, we create a probe type:
tree probe = make_node (COMPLEX_TYPE);
TREE_TYPE (probe) = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (component_type);
notice setting TREE_TYPE to main_variant of the component type. We then
insert this into the canonical type hash (or find a match).
I think my type hashing clean up exposed an underlying problem, when I
changed:
hstate.add_object (TYPE_HASH (component_type));
to
hashval_t hash = type_hash_canon_hash (t);
because that's abstractly better. However, build_complex_type then
proceeds to do two strange things.
1) regardless of whether it added a new type to the hash table, it
checks for t == CANONICAL (t) and if equal goes to recreate the
canonical type.
2) but it checks the canonicalness of component_type, not
TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (component_type), which is what the newly created
complex's TREE_TYPE was set to.
#2 is where I think things are getting confused. Anyway, this patch
simply moves all of the post-insertion setting after a check to see
whether the insertion inserted the new type, (rather than find an
existing variant). It also consistently uses TREE_TYPE (new_type), when
looking at the component type in that context.
booted on x86_64-linux-gnu. no C or C++ regressions. ok?
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
[-- Attachment #2: 83187.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5319 bytes --]
2017-11-28 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
PR c++/83817
* tree.c (build_complex_type): Fix canonicalization. Only fill in
type if it is new.
PR c++/83187
* g++.dg/opt/pr83187.C: New.
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr83187.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr83187.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr83187.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-O1 -Wno-pedantic" }
+// PR c++/83187 ICE in get_alias_set due to canonical type confusion.
+
+extern "C" {
+ double cos (double);
+ double sin (double);
+}
+
+template <typename> class COMPLEX;
+
+template <>
+struct COMPLEX<double>
+{
+ COMPLEX(double r, double i);
+
+ __complex__ mem;
+};
+
+COMPLEX<double>::COMPLEX (double r, double i)
+ : mem {r, i} {}
+
+typedef double dbl_t;
+
+dbl_t var;
+
+void foo (COMPLEX<double> *ptr)
+{
+ const dbl_t unused = var;
+
+ *ptr = COMPLEX<double> (cos (var), sin (var));
+}
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c (revision 255202)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -8077,65 +8077,66 @@ build_offset_type (tree basetype, tree t
tree
build_complex_type (tree component_type, bool named)
{
- tree t;
-
gcc_assert (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (component_type)
|| SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (component_type)
|| FIXED_POINT_TYPE_P (component_type));
/* Make a node of the sort we want. */
- t = make_node (COMPLEX_TYPE);
+ tree probe = make_node (COMPLEX_TYPE);
- TREE_TYPE (t) = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (component_type);
+ TREE_TYPE (probe) = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (component_type);
/* If we already have such a type, use the old one. */
- hashval_t hash = type_hash_canon_hash (t);
- t = type_hash_canon (hash, t);
-
- if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (t))
- layout_type (t);
+ hashval_t hash = type_hash_canon_hash (probe);
+ tree t = type_hash_canon (hash, probe);
- if (TYPE_CANONICAL (t) == t)
+ if (t == probe)
{
- if (TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P (component_type))
+ /* We created a new type. The hash insertion will have laid
+ out the type. We need to check the canonicalization and
+ maybe set the name. */
+ gcc_checking_assert (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (t)
+ && !TYPE_NAME (t)
+ && TYPE_CANONICAL (t) == t);
+
+ if (TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
SET_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY (t);
- else if (TYPE_CANONICAL (component_type) != component_type)
+ else if (TYPE_CANONICAL (TREE_TYPE (t)) != TREE_TYPE (t))
TYPE_CANONICAL (t)
- = build_complex_type (TYPE_CANONICAL (component_type), named);
- }
+ = build_complex_type (TYPE_CANONICAL (TREE_TYPE (t)), named);
- /* We need to create a name, since complex is a fundamental type. */
- if (!TYPE_NAME (t) && named)
- {
- const char *name;
- if (component_type == char_type_node)
- name = "complex char";
- else if (component_type == signed_char_type_node)
- name = "complex signed char";
- else if (component_type == unsigned_char_type_node)
- name = "complex unsigned char";
- else if (component_type == short_integer_type_node)
- name = "complex short int";
- else if (component_type == short_unsigned_type_node)
- name = "complex short unsigned int";
- else if (component_type == integer_type_node)
- name = "complex int";
- else if (component_type == unsigned_type_node)
- name = "complex unsigned int";
- else if (component_type == long_integer_type_node)
- name = "complex long int";
- else if (component_type == long_unsigned_type_node)
- name = "complex long unsigned int";
- else if (component_type == long_long_integer_type_node)
- name = "complex long long int";
- else if (component_type == long_long_unsigned_type_node)
- name = "complex long long unsigned int";
- else
- name = 0;
-
- if (name != 0)
- TYPE_NAME (t) = build_decl (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, TYPE_DECL,
- get_identifier (name), t);
+ /* We need to create a name, since complex is a fundamental type. */
+ if (named)
+ {
+ const char *name = NULL;
+
+ if (TREE_TYPE (t) == char_type_node)
+ name = "complex char";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == signed_char_type_node)
+ name = "complex signed char";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == unsigned_char_type_node)
+ name = "complex unsigned char";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == short_integer_type_node)
+ name = "complex short int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == short_unsigned_type_node)
+ name = "complex short unsigned int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == integer_type_node)
+ name = "complex int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == unsigned_type_node)
+ name = "complex unsigned int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == long_integer_type_node)
+ name = "complex long int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == long_unsigned_type_node)
+ name = "complex long unsigned int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == long_long_integer_type_node)
+ name = "complex long long int";
+ else if (TREE_TYPE (t) == long_long_unsigned_type_node)
+ name = "complex long long unsigned int";
+
+ if (name != NULL)
+ TYPE_NAME (t) = build_decl (UNKNOWN_LOCATION, TYPE_DECL,
+ get_identifier (name), t);
+ }
}
return build_qualified_type (t, TYPE_QUALS (component_type));
next reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 18:52 Nathan Sidwell [this message]
2017-11-29 9:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-11-29 9:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=384ed945-83b4-b421-ab82-92b5e236d874@acm.org \
--to=nathan@acm.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).