From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69114 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2016 14:22:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69098 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2016 14:22:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=fly, reader X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:22:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A66A7571 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-168.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.168]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9KEMA6c002987; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:22:12 -0400 Subject: Re: INSN_UIDs again (was Re: [PATCH 15/16] RTL frontend (rtl1), on top of dump reader) To: David Malcolm , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <1475684110-2521-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1475684110-2521-16-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1476971747.28626.7.camel@redhat.com> <1476973228.28626.14.camel@redhat.com> From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <39322382-1843-8036-864c-c9060de07e00@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1476973228.28626.14.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg01651.txt.bz2 On 10/20/2016 04:20 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > What kind of comparison would it do? Use read-rtl to read the "after" representation and compare it on the fly to what we actually have after running the pass under test. Bernd