From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58029 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2015 14:31:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58016 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2015 14:31:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 14:31:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A472CF2880; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:31:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aiwy0sDEO2jS; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:31:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA2972CF2872; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 15:31:29 +0100 (CET) From: Eric Botcazou To: Martin Jambor Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener Subject: Re: [patch] Fix ICE on unaligned record field Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <39591565.4dzdeQJUrH@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.1.10-1.29-desktop; KDE/4.7.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150225154303.GE20953@virgil.suse> References: <3887233.jQSJCmu5YU@polaris> <14069807.eYpOW1jBVs@polaris> <20150225154303.GE20953@virgil.suse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg01746.txt.bz2 > for various reasons I was not able to do it earlier, but today I have > re-bootstrapped the following (the only change is the added testcase) > on x86_64-linux and it passes OK. Should I commit it to trunk then? Yes, that would be kind of you, thanks in advance. -- Eric Botcazou