From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81769 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2015 21:19:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81749 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2015 21:19:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: nef2.ens.fr Received: from nef2.ens.fr (HELO nef2.ens.fr) (129.199.96.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:19:43 +0000 Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [129.199.120.1]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id t91LJeLh022813 ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:19:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3FD14F; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:19:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2CrdltEBRIt; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:19:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (log78-1-82-242-47-10.fbx.proxad.net [82.242.47.10]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42A25148; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:19:40 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dominique_d=27Humi=C3=A8res?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] fortran/67802 -- Numeric constant character length must ... Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 21:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: <396D531A-42D2-454C-9DAE-0A646AC295EA@lps.ens.fr> Cc: FX Coudert , GNU GFortran , GCC Patches To: Steve Kargl Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Without initialization the errors are of the kind: Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type, found * see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2015-10/msg00081.html. Should not we ge= t the same message with initialization? Cheers, Dominique