From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58418 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2016 13:47:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 58399 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2016 13:47:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:ens, dear, HTo:U*jvdelisle X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: nef2.ens.fr Received: from nef2.ens.fr (HELO nef2.ens.fr) (129.199.96.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:47:21 +0000 Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [129.199.120.1]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id u95DlCZJ073634 ; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D712B12F; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.lps.ens.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tournesol.lps.ens.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qK8Y4ddT2esN; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (log78-1-82-242-47-10.fbx.proxad.net [82.242.47.10]) by mailhost.lps.ens.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A56CE11F; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:47:12 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dominique_d=27Humi=C3=A8res?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Patch, libgfortran] Inquire internal unit within child dtio procedure Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <3C66424E-74CF-4B81-939F-383C08D01B21@lps.ens.fr> Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches List To: "jvdelisle@charter.net" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00237.txt.bz2 Dear Jerry, > Committed as trivial. Many things are trivial unless noted otherwise! The patch causes the follow= ing failures: FAIL: gfortran.dg/inquire_13.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/inquire_15.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/inquire_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/inquire_9.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/large_unit_2.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/make_unit.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/negative_unit.f -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/negative_unit_int8.f -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr20950.f -O0 execution test see, e.g., https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2016-10/msg00375.html. Also the test gfortran.dg/dtio_15.f90 succeeds even with revision r240768 r= everted. Thanks for working on the issue while waiting for the four character fix! Dominique