public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	krebbel@linux.ibm.com,        jakub@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Improve storing asan frame_pc
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 13:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CC32047-1B4E-46E5-B3DE-B53B870CD565@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190702131957.GJ18316@gate.crashing.org>

> Am 02.07.2019 um 15:19 schrieb Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 08:02:16AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:51:54AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>>> +#undef TARGET_INSN_ALIGNMENT
>>> +#define TARGET_INSN_ALIGNMENT 16
>> 
>> There already is FUNCTION_BOUNDARY for something similar, which fits in
>> well with STACK_BOUNDARY, PARM_BOUNDARY, many more *_BOUNDARY.  I realise
>> you may prefer a hook, but as long as we aren't getting rid of all the
>> other macros, what's the point?
> 
> And maybe LABEL_BOUNDARY is bettter for this than INSN_BOUNDARY as well?

Can’t we just use FUNCTION_BOUNDARY then?
I think .LASANPC is always emitted at the beginning of a function.

Best regards,
Ilya

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-02 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-02  8:52 Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-02 13:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-02 13:20   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-02 13:34     ` Ilya Leoshkevich [this message]
2019-07-02 13:40       ` Jakub Jelinek
2019-07-02 13:56         ` Ilya Leoshkevich
2019-07-02 14:26           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-03 21:49             ` Richard Sandiford
2019-07-04 11:18               ` Ilya Leoshkevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CC32047-1B4E-46E5-B3DE-B53B870CD565@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).