From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26415 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2002 16:35:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26168 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2002 16:35:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bothner.com) (216.102.199.253) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Oct 2002 16:35:11 -0000 Received: from bothner.com (eureka.bothner.com [192.168.1.9]) by bothner.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9RGZUG07085; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:35:30 -0800 Message-ID: <3DBC14F3.10700@bothner.com> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 08:35:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Jaeger CC: java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: New java/status.html file References: <3DB98697.4000800@bothner.com> <87lm4ml3pl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <3DBB8C37.1030408@bothner.com> In-Reply-To: <3DB98697.4000800@bothner.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg01634.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Per Bothner writes: > > > >I checked in http://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html . > > > >Please look it over and if there is anything you know is > >wrong, or believe to be incomplete or misleading, please > >fix it, if you can. > > > We should add that Linux on x86-64 is a supported target. Ok to > commit the appended patch? > Does assume "x86-64" refer to the AMD "Hammer" architecture? If so, I'd make that clear. Perhaps: GNU/Linux on the AMD x86-64 ("Hammer") architecture. Then check it in. If it is CVS-only (not in 3.2), add (in CVS). -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/