From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27518 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2003 05:08:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27509 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2003 05:08:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta1.wss.scd.yahoo.com) (66.218.85.32) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2003 05:08:47 -0000 Received: from specifixinc.com (67.161.44.241) by mta1.wss.scd.yahoo.com (7.0.016) (authenticated as jim@tuliptree.org) id 3F5CE74A0012A8C6; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:08:46 -0700 Message-ID: <3F600365.4050103@specifixinc.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 14:49:00 -0000 From: Jim Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030716 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Quinn CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <16222.38629.242390.535749@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 Jerry Quinn wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00013.html You should include a few words about the patch. Otherwise people may assume it isn't their area and not bother to click through. The patch looks correct to me. I checked it in. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com