public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
To: Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: stam.markianos-wright@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm, doloop: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a081c84-27dc-42b4-b9d4-a91799344d1d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523143742.28518-1-andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>

On 23/05/2024 15:37, Andre Vieira wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>   We held these two patches back in stage 4 because they touched target-agnostic code, though I am quite confident they will not affect other targets. Given stage one has reopened, I am reposting them, I rebased them but they seem to apply cleanly on trunk.
>   No changes from previously reviewed patches.
> 
>   OK for trunk?
> 
> Andre Vieira (2):
>   doloop: Add support for predicated vectorized loops
>   arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops
> 
>  gcc/config/arm/arm-protos.h                   |    4 +-
>  gcc/config/arm/arm.cc                         | 1249 ++++++++++++++++-
>  gcc/config/arm/arm.opt                        |    3 +
>  gcc/config/arm/iterators.md                   |   15 +
>  gcc/config/arm/mve.md                         |   50 +
>  gcc/config/arm/thumb2.md                      |  138 +-
>  gcc/config/arm/types.md                       |    6 +-
>  gcc/config/arm/unspecs.md                     |   14 +-
>  gcc/df-core.cc                                |   15 +
>  gcc/df.h                                      |    1 +
>  gcc/loop-doloop.cc                            |  164 ++-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob.h            |  128 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob1.c           |   23 +-
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lob6.c           |    8 +-
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c  |  146 ++
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c  |  749 ++++++++++
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c  |   46 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c    |   44 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c        |   31 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c    |   45 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c        |   31 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c    |   48 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c        |   28 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c    |   44 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c        |   32 +
>  .../gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c    |  521 +++++++
>  26 files changed, 3434 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-1.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-2.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-compile-asm-3.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8-run.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int16x8.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4-run.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int32x4.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2-run.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int64x2.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16-run.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-int8x16.c
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/dlstp-invalid-asm.c
> 

These are OK.  Please watch out for any fallout on other architectures.

R.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-19 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 14:37 [PATCH 0/2] arm,doloop: " Andre Vieira
2024-05-23 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] doloop: Add support for predicated vectorized loops Andre Vieira
2024-05-23 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: Add support for MVE Tail-Predicated Low Overhead Loops Andre Vieira
2024-06-19 12:40 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists) [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-23  8:22 [PATCH 0/2] arm,doloop: " Andre Vieira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a081c84-27dc-42b4-b9d4-a91799344d1d@arm.com \
    --to=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=stam.markianos-wright@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).