From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111136 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 12:46:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111123 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 12:46:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=equally, maintainance, H*f:CAFiYyc0, H*f:sk:946f9b7 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:46:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 949623D949; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-7-139.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.7.139]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9CCkRq3021225; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:46:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align To: Richard Biener References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <946f9b72-ca43-9306-9546-20b32793f9e0@redhat.com> Cc: John David Anglin , Jakub Jelinek , Florian Weimer , "Carlos O'Donell" , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jeff Law From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <3b8dcdb2-e18b-ad02-762b-2b311ac5d0e2@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2 On 10/12/2016 02:43 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > I'd say what applies to PA should apply equally well to the pdp11 and > the alpha port ... > > But usually the question is just whether the port has a maintainer > and/or whether it is > a maintainance burden to keep it (say, last user of obsolete feature X). Well, we seem to be running into a problem with PA, and pdp11 is a cc0 port. Bernd