From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: member alias tmpl partial inst [PR103994]
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:43:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bdbe404-a1a1-41de-a567-09b1d82a8e68@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9add3ac2-6a43-1c87-7a38-3194368a37aa@idea>
On 3/7/24 14:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/4/24 17:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
>>>> OK for trunk?
>>>>
>>>> -- >8 --
>>>>
>>>> Alias templates are weird in that their specializations can appear in
>>>> both decl_specializations and type_specializations. They appear in the
>>>> latter only at parse time via finish_template_type. This should probably
>>>> be revisited in GCC 15 since it seems sufficient to store them only in
>>>> decl_specializations.
>>>
>>> It looks like most all of lookup_template_class is wrong for alias templates.
>>>
>>> Can we move the alias template handling up higher and unconditionally return
>>> the result of tsubst?
>>
>> This works nicely (although we have to use instantiate_alias_template
>> directly instead of tsubst since tsubst would first substitute the
>> uncoerced arguments into the generic DECL_TI_ARGS which breaks for
>> for parameter packs). And it allows for some nice simplifications in
>> the modules code which had to handle alias template specializations
>> specially.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>>
>> -- >8 --
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] c++/modules: member alias tmpl partial inst [PR103994]
>>
>> Alias templates are weird in that their specializations can appear in
>> both decl_specializations and type_specializations. They appear in the
>> type table only at parse time via finish_template_type. There seems
>> to be no good reason for this, and the code paths end up stepping over
>> each other in particular for a partial alias template instantiation such
>> as A<B>::key_arg<T> in the below modules testcase: the type code path
>> (lookup_template_class) wants to set TI_TEMPLATE to the most general
>> template whereas the decl code path (tsubst_template_decl called during
>> instantiation of A<B>) already set TI_TEMPLATE to the partially
>> instantiated TEMPLATE_DECL. This ends up confusing modules which
>> decides to stream the logically equivalent TYPE_DECL and TEMPLATE_DECL
>> for this partial alias template instantiation separately.
>>
>> This patch fixes this by making lookup_template_class dispatch to
>> instantiatie_alias_template early for alias template specializations.
>> In turn we now only add such specializations to the decl table and
>> not also the type table. This admits some nice simplification in
>> the modules code which otherwise has to cope with such specializations
>> appearing in both tables.
>>
>> PR c++/103994
>>
>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * cp-tree.h (add_mergeable_specialization): Remove is_alias
>> parameter.
>> * module.cc (depset::disc_bits::DB_ALIAS_SPEC_BIT): Remove.
>> (depset::is_alias): Remove.
>> (merge_kind::MK_tmpl_alias_mask): Remove.
>> (merge_kind::MK_alias_spec): Remove.
>> (merge_kind_name): Remove entries for alias specializations.
>> (trees_in::decl_value): Adjust add_mergeable_specialization
>> calls.
>> (trees_out::get_merge_kind) <case depset::EK_SPECIALIZATION>:
>> Use MK_decl_spec for alias template specializations.
>> (trees_out::key_mergeable): Simplify after MK_tmpl_alias_mask
>> removal.
>> (specialization_add): Don't allow alias templates when !decl_p.
>> (depset::hash::add_specializations): Remove now-dead code
>> accomodating alias template specializations in the type table.
>> * pt.cc (lookup_template_class): Dispatch early to
>> instantiate_alias_template for alias templates. Simplify
>> accordingly.
>> (add_mergeable_specialization): Remove alias_p parameter and
>> simplify accordingly.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H: s/alias/decl in dump scan.
>> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H: Likewise.
>> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H: New test.
>> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C: New test.
>> ---
>> gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 3 +-
>> gcc/cp/module.cc | 50 ++----------
>> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 84 ++++++++------------
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H | 2 +-
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H | 2 +-
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H | 15 ++++
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C | 9 +++
>> 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> index 4469d965ef0..14895bc6585 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>> @@ -7642,8 +7642,7 @@ extern void walk_specializations (bool,
>> void *);
>> extern tree match_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, spec_entry *);
>> extern unsigned get_mergeable_specialization_flags (tree tmpl, tree spec);
>> -extern void add_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, bool is_alias,
>> - spec_entry *,
>> +extern void add_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, spec_entry *,
>> tree outer, unsigned);
>> extern tree add_to_template_args (tree, tree);
>> extern tree add_outermost_template_args (tree, tree);
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
>> index 4ecd6d7c813..cc038ee9cba 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
>> @@ -2306,10 +2306,7 @@ private:
>> /* The following bits are not independent, but enumerating them is
>> awkward. */
>> DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT, /* An alias template instantiation. */
>
> It seems we don't need DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT anymore either, so the
> updated patch below removes it too.
OK.
> -- >8 --
>
> PR c++/103994
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * cp-tree.h (add_mergeable_specialization): Remove is_alias
> parameter.
> * module.cc (depset::disc_bits::DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT): Remove.
> (depset::disc_bits::DB_ALIAS_SPEC_BIT): Remove.
> (depset::is_alias_tmpl_inst): Remove.
> (depset::is_alias): Remove.
> (merge_kind::MK_tmpl_alias_mask): Remove.
> (merge_kind::MK_alias_spec): Remove.
> (merge_kind_name): Remove entries for alias specializations.
> (trees_out::core_vals) <case TEMPLATE_DECL>: Adjust after
> removing is_alias_tmpl_inst.
> (trees_in::decl_value): Adjust add_mergeable_specialization
> calls.
> (trees_out::get_merge_kind) <case depset::EK_SPECIALIZATION>:
> Use MK_decl_spec for alias template specializations.
> (trees_out::key_mergeable): Simplify after MK_tmpl_alias_mask
> removal.
> (depset::hash::make_dependency): Adjust after removing
> DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT.
> (specialization_add): Don't allow alias templates when !decl_p.
> (depset::hash::add_specializations): Remove now-dead code
> accomodating alias template specializations in the type table.
> * pt.cc (lookup_template_class): Dispatch early to
> instantiate_alias_template for alias templates. Simplify
> accordingly.
> (add_mergeable_specialization): Remove alias_p parameter and
> simplify accordingly.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H: s/alias/decl in dump scan.
> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H: Likewise.
> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H: New test.
> * g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 3 +-
> gcc/cp/module.cc | 86 ++++----------------
> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 84 ++++++++-----------
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H | 2 +-
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H | 15 ++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C | 9 ++
> 7 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index 4469d965ef0..14895bc6585 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -7642,8 +7642,7 @@ extern void walk_specializations (bool,
> void *);
> extern tree match_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, spec_entry *);
> extern unsigned get_mergeable_specialization_flags (tree tmpl, tree spec);
> -extern void add_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, bool is_alias,
> - spec_entry *,
> +extern void add_mergeable_specialization (bool is_decl, spec_entry *,
> tree outer, unsigned);
> extern tree add_to_template_args (tree, tree);
> extern tree add_outermost_template_args (tree, tree);
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> index 4ecd6d7c813..dfe4536c0ae 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> @@ -2305,11 +2305,7 @@ private:
> DB_HIDDEN_BIT, /* A hidden binding. */
> /* The following bits are not independent, but enumerating them is
> awkward. */
> - DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT, /* An alias template instantiation. */
> - DB_ALIAS_SPEC_BIT, /* Specialization of an alias template
> - (in both spec tables). */
> - DB_TYPE_SPEC_BIT, /* Specialization in the type table.
> - */
> + DB_TYPE_SPEC_BIT, /* Specialization in the type table. */
> DB_FRIEND_SPEC_BIT, /* An instantiated template friend. */
> };
>
> @@ -2400,14 +2396,6 @@ public:
> {
> return get_flag_bit<DB_UNREACHED_BIT> ();
> }
> - bool is_alias_tmpl_inst () const
> - {
> - return get_flag_bit<DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT> ();
> - }
> - bool is_alias () const
> - {
> - return get_flag_bit<DB_ALIAS_SPEC_BIT> ();
> - }
> bool is_hidden () const
> {
> return get_flag_bit<DB_HIDDEN_BIT> ();
> @@ -2782,13 +2770,11 @@ enum merge_kind
> MK_template_mask = 0x10, /* A template specialization. */
>
> MK_tmpl_decl_mask = 0x4, /* In decl table. */
> - MK_tmpl_alias_mask = 0x2, /* Also in type table */
>
> MK_tmpl_tmpl_mask = 0x1, /* We want TEMPLATE_DECL. */
>
> MK_type_spec = MK_template_mask,
> MK_decl_spec = MK_template_mask | MK_tmpl_decl_mask,
> - MK_alias_spec = MK_decl_spec | MK_tmpl_alias_mask,
>
> MK_hwm = 0x20
> };
> @@ -2806,7 +2792,7 @@ static char const *const merge_kind_name[MK_hwm] =
> NULL, NULL,
>
> "decl spec", "decl tmpl spec", /* 20,21 decl (template). */
> - "alias spec", "alias tmpl spec", /* 22,23 alias (template). */
> + NULL, NULL,
> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> };
> @@ -6356,8 +6342,7 @@ trees_out::core_vals (tree t)
> gcc_checking_assert
> (TREE_VISITED (((lang_tree_node *)t)->template_decl.arguments));
> gcc_checking_assert
> - (TREE_VISITED (((lang_tree_node *)t)->template_decl.result)
> - || dep_hash->find_dependency (t)->is_alias_tmpl_inst ());
> + (TREE_VISITED (((lang_tree_node *)t)->template_decl.result));
> if (DECL_UNINSTANTIATED_TEMPLATE_FRIEND_P (t))
> WT (DECL_CHAIN (t));
> break;
> @@ -8306,16 +8291,13 @@ trees_in::decl_value ()
> {
> bool is_type = TREE_CODE (inner) == TYPE_DECL;
> spec.spec = is_type ? type : inner;
> - add_mergeable_specialization (!is_type, false,
> - &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> + add_mergeable_specialization (!is_type, &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> }
> else if (mk & MK_template_mask)
> {
> bool is_type = !(mk & MK_tmpl_decl_mask);
> spec.spec = is_type ? type : mk & MK_tmpl_tmpl_mask ? inner : decl;
> - add_mergeable_specialization (!is_type,
> - !is_type && mk & MK_tmpl_alias_mask,
> - &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> + add_mergeable_specialization (!is_type, &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> }
>
> if (NAMESPACE_SCOPE_P (decl)
> @@ -8392,7 +8374,7 @@ trees_in::decl_value ()
> if (!e)
> {
> spec.spec = inner;
> - add_mergeable_specialization (true, false, &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> + add_mergeable_specialization (true, &spec, decl, spec_flags);
> }
> else if (e != existing)
> set_overrun ();
> @@ -10620,8 +10602,6 @@ trees_out::get_merge_kind (tree decl, depset *dep)
> mk = MK_friend_spec;
> else if (dep->is_type_spec ())
> mk = MK_type_spec;
> - else if (dep->is_alias ())
> - mk = MK_alias_spec;
> else
> mk = MK_decl_spec;
>
> @@ -10732,11 +10712,6 @@ trees_out::key_mergeable (int tag, merge_kind mk, tree decl, tree inner,
> gcc_assert (existing);
> if (mk & MK_tmpl_decl_mask)
> {
> - if (mk & MK_tmpl_alias_mask)
> - /* It should be in both tables. */
> - gcc_checking_assert
> - (same_type_p (match_mergeable_specialization (false, entry),
> - TREE_TYPE (existing)));
> if (mk & MK_tmpl_tmpl_mask)
> existing = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (existing);
> }
> @@ -12830,17 +12805,12 @@ depset::hash::make_dependency (tree decl, entity_kind ek)
> bindings. */
> *slot = dep = make_entity (decl, ek, has_def);
>
> - if (TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
> - {
> - if (DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (decl) && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (decl))
> - dep->set_flag_bit<DB_ALIAS_TMPL_INST_BIT> ();
> - else if (CHECKING_P)
> - /* The template_result should otherwise not be in the
> - table, or be an empty redirect (created above). */
> - if (auto *eslot = entity_slot (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl), false))
> - gcc_checking_assert ((*eslot)->get_entity_kind () == EK_REDIRECT
> - && !(*eslot)->deps.length ());
> - }
> + if (CHECKING_P && TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
> + /* The template_result should otherwise not be in the
> + table, or be an empty redirect (created above). */
> + if (auto *eslot = entity_slot (DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (decl), false))
> + gcc_checking_assert ((*eslot)->get_entity_kind () == EK_REDIRECT
> + && !(*eslot)->deps.length ());
>
> if (ek != EK_USING)
> {
> @@ -13228,16 +13198,11 @@ specialization_add (bool decl_p, spec_entry *entry, void *data_)
> heuristic. We don't attempt to replicate that algorithm, but
> observe its behaviour and reproduce it upon read back. */
>
> - gcc_checking_assert (DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (entry->tmpl)
> - || TREE_CODE (entry->spec) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
> + gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (entry->spec) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
> || DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (entry->tmpl));
>
> - /* Only alias templates can appear in both tables (and
> - if they're in the type table they must also be in the decl
> - table). */
> gcc_checking_assert
> - (!match_mergeable_specialization (true, entry)
> - == !DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (entry->tmpl));
> + (!match_mergeable_specialization (true, entry));
> }
> else if (VAR_OR_FUNCTION_DECL_P (entry->spec))
> gcc_checking_assert (!DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P (entry->spec));
> @@ -13293,7 +13258,6 @@ depset::hash::add_specializations (bool decl_p)
> spec_entry *entry = data.pop ();
> tree spec = entry->spec;
> int use_tpl = 0;
> - bool is_alias = false;
> bool is_friend = false;
>
> if (decl_p && DECL_UNINSTANTIATED_TEMPLATE_FRIEND_P (entry->tmpl))
> @@ -13301,13 +13265,7 @@ depset::hash::add_specializations (bool decl_p)
> instantiation. */
> is_friend = true;
>
> - if (!decl_p && DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (entry->tmpl))
> - {
> - spec = TYPE_NAME (spec);
> - is_alias = true;
> - }
> -
> - if (decl_p || is_alias)
> + if (decl_p)
> {
> if (tree ti = DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (spec))
> {
> @@ -13392,20 +13350,10 @@ depset::hash::add_specializations (bool decl_p)
> gcc_checking_assert (!TREE_VISITED (spec));
> depset *dep = make_dependency (spec, depset::EK_SPECIALIZATION);
> if (dep->is_special ())
> - {
> - /* An already located specialization, this must be the TYPE
> - corresponding to an alias_decl we found in the decl
> - table. */
> - spec_entry *other = reinterpret_cast <spec_entry *> (dep->deps[0]);
> - gcc_checking_assert (!decl_p && is_alias && !dep->is_type_spec ());
> - gcc_checking_assert (other->tmpl == entry->tmpl
> - && template_args_equal (other->args, entry->args)
> - && TREE_TYPE (other->spec) == entry->spec);
> - dep->set_flag_bit<DB_ALIAS_SPEC_BIT> ();
> - }
> + gcc_unreachable ();
> else
> {
> - gcc_checking_assert (decl_p || !is_alias);
> + gcc_checking_assert (decl_p);
> if (dep->get_entity_kind () == depset::EK_REDIRECT)
> dep = dep->deps[0];
> else if (dep->get_entity_kind () == depset::EK_SPECIALIZATION)
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index d73f6d93485..99aa64b1cc3 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -10055,6 +10055,32 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> /* Now we should have enough arguments. */
> gcc_assert (parm_depth == arg_depth);
>
> + if (DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
> + {
> + /* The user referred to a specialization of an alias
> + template represented by GEN_TMPL.
> +
> + [temp.alias]/2 says:
> +
> + When a template-id refers to the specialization of an
> + alias template, it is equivalent to the associated
> + type obtained by substitution of its
> + template-arguments for the template-parameters in the
> + type-id of the alias template. */
> +
> + t = instantiate_alias_template (gen_tmpl, arglist, complain);
> + /* Note that the call above (by indirectly calling
> + register_specialization in tsubst_decl) registers the
> + TYPE_DECL representing the specialization of the alias
> + template. So next time someone substitutes ARGLIST for
> + the template parms into the alias template (GEN_TMPL),
> + she'll get that TYPE_DECL back. */
> +
> + if (t == error_mark_node)
> + return error_mark_node;
> + return TREE_TYPE (t);
> + }
I'm surprised we don't still need the call to coerce_template_parms, a
bit below this?
> /* From here on, we're only interested in the most general
> template. */
>
> @@ -10120,7 +10146,6 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> lookup. This prevents redundant checks on previously
> instantiated specializations. */
> if (flag_concepts
> - && !DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl)
> && !constraints_satisfied_p (gen_tmpl, arglist))
> {
> if (complain & tf_error)
> @@ -10189,31 +10214,7 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> context = global_namespace;
>
> /* Create the type. */
> - if (DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
> - {
> - /* The user referred to a specialization of an alias
> - template represented by GEN_TMPL.
> -
> - [temp.alias]/2 says:
> -
> - When a template-id refers to the specialization of an
> - alias template, it is equivalent to the associated
> - type obtained by substitution of its
> - template-arguments for the template-parameters in the
> - type-id of the alias template. */
> -
> - t = tsubst (TREE_TYPE (gen_tmpl), arglist, complain, in_decl);
> - /* Note that the call above (by indirectly calling
> - register_specialization in tsubst_decl) registers the
> - TYPE_DECL representing the specialization of the alias
> - template. So next time someone substitutes ARGLIST for
> - the template parms into the alias template (GEN_TMPL),
> - she'll get that TYPE_DECL back. */
> -
> - if (t == error_mark_node)
> - return t;
> - }
> - else if (TREE_CODE (template_type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
> + if (TREE_CODE (template_type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
> {
> if (!is_dependent_type)
> {
> @@ -10301,8 +10302,7 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> }
> }
>
> - if (OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (t)
> - && !DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
> + if (OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (t))
> {
> static const char *tags[] = {"abi_tag", "may_alias"};
>
> @@ -10369,7 +10369,7 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> {
> TREE_VEC_LENGTH (arglist)--;
> ++processing_template_decl;
> - tree tinfo = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO_MAYBE_ALIAS (TREE_TYPE (gen_tmpl));
> + tree tinfo = TYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (TREE_TYPE (gen_tmpl));
> tree partial_inst_args =
> tsubst (INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_ARGS (TI_ARGS (tinfo)),
> arglist, complain, NULL_TREE);
> @@ -10407,17 +10407,9 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> TEMPLATE_PARM_LEVEL. */
> found = tsubst (gen_tmpl, arglist, tf_none, NULL_TREE);
> TREE_VEC_LENGTH (arglist)++;
> - /* FOUND is either a proper class type, or an alias
> - template specialization. In the later case, it's a
> - TYPE_DECL, resulting from the substituting of arguments
> - for parameters in the TYPE_DECL of the alias template
> - done earlier. So be careful while getting the template
> - of FOUND. */
> found = (TREE_CODE (found) == TEMPLATE_DECL
> ? found
> - : (TREE_CODE (found) == TYPE_DECL
> - ? DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (found)
> - : CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (found)));
> + : CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE (found));
>
> if (DECL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_P (found)
> && CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (TREE_TYPE (found)))
> @@ -10447,8 +10439,7 @@ lookup_template_class (tree d1, tree arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
> DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATIONS (found));
>
> if (TREE_CODE (template_type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
> - && !uses_template_parms (current_nonlambda_scope ())
> - && !DECL_ALIAS_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
> + && !uses_template_parms (current_nonlambda_scope ()))
> /* Now that the type has been registered on the instantiations
> list, we set up the enumerators. Because the enumeration
> constants may involve the enumeration type itself, we make
> @@ -31578,8 +31569,8 @@ get_mergeable_specialization_flags (tree tmpl, tree decl)
> get_mergeable_specialization_flags. */
>
> void
> -add_mergeable_specialization (bool decl_p, bool alias_p, spec_entry *elt,
> - tree decl, unsigned flags)
> +add_mergeable_specialization (bool decl_p, spec_entry *elt, tree decl,
> + unsigned flags)
> {
> hashval_t hash = spec_hasher::hash (elt);
> if (decl_p)
> @@ -31590,15 +31581,8 @@ add_mergeable_specialization (bool decl_p, bool alias_p, spec_entry *elt,
> auto entry = ggc_alloc<spec_entry> ();
> *entry = *elt;
> *slot = entry;
> -
> - if (alias_p)
> - {
> - elt->spec = TREE_TYPE (elt->spec);
> - gcc_checking_assert (elt->spec);
> - }
> }
> -
> - if (!decl_p || alias_p)
> + else
> {
> auto *slot = type_specializations->find_slot_with_hash (elt, hash, INSERT);
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H
> index 53d28b4ef5e..e75b3129dd3 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr99425-1_b.H
> @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ inline void widget (Cont parm)
> ssize (parm);
> }
>
> -// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Read:-[0-9]*'s alias spec merge key \(new\) type_decl:'::make_signed_t'\n ... Read:-[0-9]*'s type spec merge key \(new\) type_decl:'::make_signed'\n Read:-[0-9]*'s named merge key \(matched\) template_decl:'::template ssize'} module } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Read:-[0-9]*'s decl spec merge key \(new\) type_decl:'::make_signed_t'\n ... Read:-[0-9]*'s type spec merge key \(new\) type_decl:'::make_signed'\n Read:-[0-9]*'s named merge key \(matched\) template_decl:'::template ssize'} module } }
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H
> index 37002ee9ae1..14a25be586f 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-1_a.H
> @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@
> // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing decl tmpl spec:-[0-9]* template_decl:'::allocator_traits<::allocator<long int>>::template rebind_alloc<_Up>'} module } }
> // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing decl tmpl spec:-[0-9]* type_decl:'::allocator_traits<::allocator<long int>>::template rebind_alloc<_Up>'} module } }
>
> -// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing:-[0-9]*'s alias spec merge key \(specialization\) type_decl:'::allocator_traits<::allocator<long int>>::rebind_alloc<long int>'} module } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing:-[0-9]*'s decl spec merge key \(specialization\) type_decl:'::allocator_traits<::allocator<long int>>::rebind_alloc<long int>'} module } }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..76917f778e0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_a.H
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +// PR c++/103994
> +// { dg-additional-options -fmodule-header }
> +// { dg-module-cmi {} }
> +
> +template<class>
> +struct A {
> + template<class> using key_arg = int;
> +};
> +
> +struct B {
> + template<class T>
> + void f() {
> + using type = A<B>::key_arg<T>;
> + }
> +};
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..44fa5f42757
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/tpl-alias-2_b.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// PR c++/103994
> +// { dg-additional-options -fmodules-ts }
> +
> +import "tpl-alias-2_a.H";
> +
> +int main() {
> + B b;
> + b.f<int>();
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 22:26 Patrick Palka
2024-03-07 3:55 ` Jason Merrill
2024-03-07 16:06 ` Patrick Palka
2024-03-07 19:41 ` Patrick Palka
2024-03-07 20:43 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2024-03-07 20:58 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bdbe404-a1a1-41de-a567-09b1d82a8e68@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).