From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa1.mentor.iphmx.com (esa1.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.129.153]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC603858D32 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2023 21:25:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0AC603858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ol75twGiTPSPATzLDNim9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UFPsS0O0SKWX+RMp5xxoyw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,157,1688457600"; d="scan'208";a="19462247" Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa1.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2023 13:25:23 -0800 IronPort-SDR: ApCVJqsLaZDPmp7x/ASNRtRrkucxerm3T0r3ikvO4rbxMgIh785BTOWdG0AG+RSVDIq6up2BNd J6hU8kmsrZ06lfOuo5eX382OzE9w9ExmJQT1bN6HploIggh8NgTAHmq7cr+eHk93ceDIgVJACF SfHD9Q5RozjNUrpuitegNCkXLlhMJCxrA/EwhOSnbNDu59fwdZHqWyfDAZpOGYqwfYnd3rnr36 Y9dNlugXjt3IBsMjmuGemqH/j3pM71MDnK62vWcgG9znYc0H+0X3I2LK3lcwS6jsvccY6dnFKu mCM= Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 21:25:19 +0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Jakub Jelinek CC: Subject: Re: Patch ping: Re: [PATCH] c, c++, v2: Accept __builtin_classify_type (typename) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3c117643-59c-8cd7-f6a6-3663fb524dde@codesourcery.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-12.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.12) To svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3104.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, 18 Sep 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping this patch. > The C++ FE part has been approved by Jason already with a minor change > I've made in my copy. > Are the remaining parts ok for trunk? In the C front-end changes, since you end up discarding any side effects from the type, I'd expect use of in_alignof to be more appropriate than in_typeof (and thus not needing to use pop_maybe_used). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com