From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7DC3858D1E for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:25:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0D7DC3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9922d6f003cso125463466b.0 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689261925; x=1691853925; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zD6kTU4LGDsKUND0QeDtA3sYnznxwWQn0lT58Jb/Mds=; b=IkH26kvidyGGESmfCsVMIyXClKVM00+9VGhvS26378PzlGbt3zAjhKk7mHWVf5qCTZ CZfNuFs392Wu3z+U4iEmjzmiJvVfPotHS57xm0iYoB+3xqg6+C90Ui63Vab61Dvc8Fug Jtpkx6/MscSegun+lPt/ytICyFWHuf/44d32f2TqRgk8Sp6qvJNv7BMYN7UKFJO7bjGj UIcd7RqzlUqidOnrrHLHTy4nIGlNGKL9fQUZkEbMCA10kI6JTzH9DJEbA90SJeAn3AsS Pe6YwFdHsMGpxm0q8NWk1sF3M1o6cNgygcVYYOAeqvKTLQn22GohXjC2m1d0URHiG7/g wZKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689261925; x=1691853925; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zD6kTU4LGDsKUND0QeDtA3sYnznxwWQn0lT58Jb/Mds=; b=JrcpVokQCQsqWIrdWRY29kK7EZRRgEtNdv+xCAOZynZB7miakA8OY7zPSpyMfSoOUb Pu7KXiIpv+Z+42eKyxgULKS+bd9fyE0kKbaiX5LPA8lz4D6oXEGgEnX5ew9g+Fn0QjGl Vs0JHQFY9sBhtcc7E3a0bR88+JfmGJP8NlLwZ4bTPZ73M7bAyGm+i28oAAXRTX9lIWC9 iMI6LwRolm81Lu6SDIGm6d6V5qNhY4wMAmvg40Na+JdlerhFoRmjOeIbPDtLX/GNuI63 MSxzXAIM0RwsuEbuaWatuweuDnTxn5xWsPG6yWE2vSNgX8ec9yXSvQIGMRX4g6A5rdjo wrLg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbIon07YjFoWTOSD8kud73O40YykdxBjHoew4DEn5F+oW4RKFn9 8hLqv85aCOzJO/Y1sCf9hYo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGlAHeylpmSsfEvF4o2YtWaM9am3ZVK4Jk/Pttod2TPYN0Hzh+/S2D7MdPnI225TIa5NVMY6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:77d4:b0:993:f12a:39ce with SMTP id m20-20020a17090677d400b00993f12a39cemr1902223ejn.15.1689261924526; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.23] (ip-046-005-130-086.um12.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [46.5.130.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c19-20020a170906171300b00991bba473e2sm4080182eje.85.2023.07.13.08.25.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c25fe13-b8d6-e9b0-de13-e25e650a379b@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:25:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: rdapp.gcc@gmail.com, gcc-patches , jeffreyalaw , "kito.cheng" , palmer , palmer Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enable COND_LEN_FMA auto-vectorization Content-Language: en-US To: "juzhe.zhong" , Kito Cheng References: <20230713113247.249532-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> <65a82d0a-f927-c63a-d283-59a3439b6830@gmail.com> <59D9503707DFF6A3+2023071319493989380523@rivai.ai> <7E3872FEA7869C1F+05F987C9-E32C-4BE0-9BFC-9BC2C3B59134@rivai.ai> From: Robin Dapp In-Reply-To: <7E3872FEA7869C1F+05F987C9-E32C-4BE0-9BFC-9BC2C3B59134@rivai.ai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Is COND _LEN FMA ok for trunk? I can commit it without changing > scatter store testcase fix. > > It makes no sense block cond Len fma support. The middle end support > has already been merged. Then just add a TODO or so that says e.g. "For some reason we exceed the default code model's +-2 GiB limits. We should investigate why and add a proper description here. For now just make sure the test case compiles properly". Regards Robin