From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60CBC3889E04; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:05:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 60CBC3889E04 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC9722C89; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1668506748; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7vOgtlV8jLYxBfw1akLysyCIkUo978RshLOU9ew5/kE=; b=wZFKljMPUiVwbtdYvM9H9J2+mQh7FZzKE8GoIvDIluDA0EGbpNPow+/DsoGL3xdNdRXPTn Rsd7d3BPLt91E999FyT+HOwB8nXNN56IfPIamScLoPnTA6XMkKsMgA4x01+AOHTpTplZGF tKNIXMfNEbJDf1h1xS4ltmFtR7Obeno= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1668506748; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7vOgtlV8jLYxBfw1akLysyCIkUo978RshLOU9ew5/kE=; b=6JTTfBUjQpupXvuQPfb6tES1lgb2otD5zZ2UxgGjIbB9qoiRLnYGVqFWn7fKI1NsifJDqb OeOQdh1JZkxTnZBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3A313273; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id ylUyEXxkc2NlcgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:05:48 +0000 Message-ID: <3c315a3d-2729-90a0-6e71-d2d2b236b6d0@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:05:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 Subject: Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx] Content-Language: en-US To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <47e82606-c8ee-bd85-d1d3-b685f0121047@pfeifer.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: <47e82606-c8ee-bd85-d1d3-b685f0121047@pfeifer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 11/14/22 14:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: >> The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO >> list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed >> with what Sphinx currently supports. > > This migration was/is a huge and complex undertaking, and you have been > patiently chipping away at obstacle after obstacle. > > So while it probably is disappointing it did not go through this time, > you made a lot of progress and important contributions - and we all > learned quite a bit more, also in terms of (not so obvious) requirements, > dependencies, and road blocks left which you summarized. Hello. I see it similarly and I'm trying to take the best out of it. > > > Timing was tricky for me being on the road last week and I am definitely > committed to keep helping with this transition. Maybe soon after we are in > stage 1 again? For now, I'm not planning working on that in the future. Maybe, someone else can carry on working on that. > > And would it make sense to convert at least our installation docs and > https://gcc.gnu.org/install/ for the GCC 13 release? Yes, it's definitely doable as it's quite small, not split among too many .rst files and the HTML version is mainly built at our server in order to populate gcc.gnu.org/install I'm willing to help anybody, but it won't be me who will suggest/send the patches. Thanks for understanding. Martin > > Gerald