From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7396 invoked by alias); 23 May 2018 09:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7387 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2018 09:07:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2018 09:07:22 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDB41435; Wed, 23 May 2018 02:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120077-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e120077-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.206.221]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02EF23F25D; Wed, 23 May 2018 02:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Introduce be/le selectors To: Jeff Law , Segher Boessenkool , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <3e9dbbd6-2376-901a-18e9-6eb49cc71687@arm.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:33:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg01212.txt.bz2 On 22/05/18 22:21, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/21/2018 03:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> This patch creates "be" and "le" selectors, which can be used by all >> architectures, similar to ilp32 and lp64. >> >> Is this okay for trunk? >> >> >> Segher >> >> >> 2017-05-21 Segher Boessenkool >> >> gcc/testsuite/ >> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_be): New. >> (check_effective_target_le): New. > I think this is fine. "be" "le" are used all over the place in gcc and > the kernel to denote big/little endian. except when el and eb are used for perversity... :-) R. > > jeff >