From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688CD3858D28 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 688CD3858D28 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27J5xioM004250; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:57 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j24v20a7t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:57 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27J61Jch008975; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:56 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j24v20a71-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27J5pMeC030950; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:54 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hx3k8w2vh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:54 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 27J69pDR15598008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:51 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16AAAE045; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9D9AE04D; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.239.74] (unknown [9.197.239.74]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:09:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3ea1e74d-282a-4015-f42e-abafabdbfc14@linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:09:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Change insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to TARGET_POWERPC64 for VSX scalar extract/insert instructions Content-Language: en-US To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: Segher Boessenkool , David , Peter Bergner , gcc-patches References: <2ffb2ff4-540d-3bcf-4e4e-478acbdd910d@linux.ibm.com> <988a2f0f-0594-9306-566d-9e93171b9daf@linux.ibm.com> From: HAO CHEN GUI In-Reply-To: <988a2f0f-0594-9306-566d-9e93171b9daf@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: slhXVO5ED371oq6p9gOKT7ea5gDQscbX X-Proofpoint-GUID: vDOrCOBfmwmPLK7YKG9Ji8j2YNjE22G7 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-19_02,2022-08-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=902 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208190024 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:10:01 -0000 Hi Kewen, On 19/8/2022 上午 11:01, Kewen.Lin wrote: > Maybe we should add one comment here (also the other touched case) or > in the commit log saying why we reorder the dg-require-effective-target > and dg-options, since the reason isn't obvious. :) Sure, I will explain it in commit log. I submitted an internal issue for this problem too. Thanks for your review comments. Gui Haochen