From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A403858022; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:57:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C1A403858022 Received: from webmail.free.fr (unknown [172.20.243.6]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB33213F899; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 12:57:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 2a01:e0a:8e0:4370:a06a:5ff0:d6a5:6cfc by webmail.free.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 12:57:25 +0200 From: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jos=C3=A9_Rui_Faustino_de_Sousa_=3Cjrfsousa=40gmail=2Ecom?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3EPaul_Richard_Thomas?= Cc: gcc-patches , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling In-Reply-To: <59502d1619e891048bb29c987947525b@free.fr> References: <0b58905bce20c64b46e9350aaecffe08@free.fr> <5f4f1316758e46a67181ad1d5951003e@free.fr> <59502d1619e891048bb29c987947525b@free.fr> Message-ID: <3f40faad7a084f27e3cc474ba2763907@free.fr> X-Sender: dhumieres.dominique@free.fr User-Agent: Webmail Free/1.3.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:57:29 -0000 Le 2021-06-06 19:58, dhumieres.dominique@free.fr a écrit : > Hi José, > >> Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated > PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. > Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be > backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK). > > Thanks for the work, > > Dominique OK for the new version. Dominique