From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>,
Giuliano Belinassi <gbelinassi@suse.de>,
matz@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not abort compilation when dump file is /dev/*
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 13:51:41 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3rr2o071-ro3n-8665-6295-9425160r96s@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119132531.6ac44ea4@nbbrfq>
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:35:26 +0100 (CET)
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Nov 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 18, 2021, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > IMHO a more reasonable thing to do would be to not treat
> > > > -o /dev/null as a source for -dumpdir and friends. Alex?
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think we already have some special-casing for /dev/null somewhere.
> >
> > Grepping finds me the following in system.h which is already checked
> > for in gcc.c in a few places indeed.
> >
> > /* Provide a default for the HOST_BIT_BUCKET.
> > This suffices for POSIX-like hosts. */
> >
> > #ifndef HOST_BIT_BUCKET
> > #define HOST_BIT_BUCKET "/dev/null"
> > #endif
> >
> >
> > > > You did the last re-org, where'd we put such special casing?
> > >
> > > I think we're missing something like this, to avoid messing with dumpdir
> > > with -o /dev/null. We already use the same function when computing
> > > outbase just below this.
> >
> > Ah yeah, not_actual_file_p should do the trick indeed. Giuliano, can
> > you update the patch like below? I think we should still adjust
> > documentation as you did.
>
> But that wouldn't cater for the general problem that the dumpdir is not
> writable, no? Why not just simply check access W_OK of the dumpdir?
>
> Otherwise a dumpdir /dev/full or anyother such path will cause the same
> thing i guess.
I think those cases are OK to diagnose. Just choosing a
not_actual_file_p output as base to derive the dump directory is
bad.
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-16 16:52 Giuliano Belinassi
2021-11-18 9:43 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-18 12:52 ` Giuliano Belinassi
2021-11-18 14:24 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-18 21:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Giuliano Belinassi
2021-11-19 8:11 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-19 9:22 ` [PATCH] " Alexandre Oliva
2021-11-19 9:35 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-19 12:25 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-19 12:51 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-11-19 13:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Giuliano Belinassi
2021-11-19 14:12 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-19 14:47 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-21 3:47 ` Alexandre Oliva
2021-11-22 12:35 ` Giuliano Belinassi
2021-11-18 11:48 ` [PATCH] " Martin Liška
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3rr2o071-ro3n-8665-6295-9425160r96s@fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gbelinassi@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=matz@suse.com \
--cc=oliva@gnu.org \
--cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).