From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5847 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2004 19:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5829 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 19:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 13220 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2004 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from 227.148-60-66-fuji-dsl.static.surewest.net (HELO codesourcery.com) (mitchell@66.60.148.227) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 19:07:13 -0000 Message-ID: <4086C65F.2040602@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:07:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John David Anglin CC: Andrew Pinski , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, gdr@integrable-solutions.net, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch 3.3/3.4/3.5] Fix PR bootstrap/14671 References: <200404201604.i3KG4qgs007918@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> In-Reply-To: <200404201604.i3KG4qgs007918@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01401.txt.bz2 John David Anglin wrote: >>On Apr 19, 2004, at 15:57, John David Anglin wrote: >> >> >>>The good news is that Richard's patch fixes the problem. The bad >>>news is that the patch uses ggc_free which isn't in 3.3 and 3.4. >>>Implementing ggc_free looks like it would require back porting >>>3 or 4 more patches. >>> >>> >>Even better news is that ggc_free is really not need at all, it >>is an optimization. You should be able to replace the call to >>ggc_free with set that variable to NULL and have it work. >> >> > >Enclosed is a backport of Richard's patch to 3.4. The only functional >difference is the removal of the ggc_free call from end_alias_analysis. >I believe that this just defers garbage collection of reg_known_value. > >I've tested the patch on hppa64-hp-hpux11.00 and hppa-unknown-linux-gnu >with no regressions. > >Ok for 3.4? > > Yes, this is OK. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com