From: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] predcom: Adjust some unnecessary update_ssa calls
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:26:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4096f519-eb6a-37e1-046d-49cead38e8e7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1d50dbf-533e-3f98-6bba-02f4b8b8bfb4@linux.ibm.com>
On 6/8/21 3:30 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2021/6/7 下午10:46, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:29 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As Richi suggested in PR100794, this patch is to remove
>>> some unnecessary update_ssa calls with flag
>>> TODO_update_ssa_only_virtuals, also do some refactoring.
>>>
>>> Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9,
>>> x86_64-redhat-linux and aarch64-linux-gnu, built well
>>> on Power9 ppc64le with --with-build-config=bootstrap-O3,
>>> and passed both P8 and P9 SPEC2017 full build with
>>> {-O3, -Ofast} + {,-funroll-loops}.
>>>
>>> Is it ok for trunk?
>>
>> LGTM, minor comment on the fancy C++:
>>
>> + auto cleanup = [&]() {
>> + release_chains (chains);
>> + free_data_refs (datarefs);
>> + BITMAP_FREE (looparound_phis);
>> + free_affine_expand_cache (&name_expansions);
>> + };
>>
>> + cleanup ();
>> + return 0;
>>
>> so that could have been
>>
>> class cleanup {
>> ~cleanup()
>> {
>> release_chains (chains);
>> free_data_refs (datarefs);
>> BITMAP_FREE (looparound_phis);
>> free_affine_expand_cache (&name_expansions);
>> }
>> } cleanup;
>>
>> ? Or some other means of adding registering a RAII-style cleanup?
>> I mean, we can't wrap it all in
>>
>> try {...}
>> finally {...}
>>
>> because C++ doesn't have finally.
>>
>> OK with this tiny part of the C++ refactoring delayed, but we can also simply
>> discuss best options. At least for looparound_phis a good cleanup would
>> be to pass the bitmap around and use auto_bitmap local to
>> tree_predictive_commoning_loop ...
>>
>
> Thanks Richi! One draft (not ready for review) is attached for the further
> discussion. It follows the idea of RAII-style cleanup. I noticed that
> Martin suggested stepping forward to make tree_predictive_commoning_loop
> and its callees into one class (Thanks Martin), since there are not many
> this kind of C++-style work functions, I want to double confirm which option
> do you guys prefer?
I meant that not necessarily as something to include in this patch
but as a suggestion for a future improvement. If you'd like to
tackle it at any point that would be great of course :) In any
event, thanks for double-checking!
The attached patch looks good to me as well (more for the sake of
style than anything else, declaring the class copy ctor and copy
assignment = delete would make it clear it's not meant to be
copied, although in this case it's unlikely to make a practical
difference).
>
> One point you might have seen is that to make tree_predictive_commoning_loop
> and its callees as member functions of one class can avoid to pass bitmap
> looparound_phis all around what's in the draft. :)
Yes, that would simplify the interfaces of all the functions that
the info members are passed to as arguments.
Martin
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-02 9:29 Kewen.Lin
2021-06-07 14:46 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-07 15:20 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-08 9:30 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-06-08 11:02 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-08 11:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-22 2:35 ` predcom: Refactor more by encapsulating global states Kewen.Lin
2021-06-22 16:14 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 9:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 6:28 ` [PATCH] predcom: Refactor more using auto_vec Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 20:45 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-20 2:04 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-20 11:19 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-23 7:22 ` predcom: Refactor more by encapsulating global states Richard Biener
2021-06-24 9:28 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-06-08 14:26 ` Martin Sebor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4096f519-eb6a-37e1-046d-49cead38e8e7@gmail.com \
--to=msebor@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).