* [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
@ 2004-07-11 13:19 Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 13:34 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 14:49 ` Paul Brook
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-11 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Fortran mailing list, patch
Trivial fix for that bug.
Built and verified that it works as expected. I didn't commit this as
obvious, because someone might prefer if we allowed arbitrary line
lengths, as in -ffixed-line-length-N, where N is an arbitrary positive
integer. I can't see much value in that, but there might be.
- Tobi
Index: lang.opt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/lang.opt,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 lang.opt
--- lang.opt 22 May 2004 11:03:17 -0000 1.4
+++ lang.opt 11 Jul 2004 12:22:06 -0000
@@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ fimplicit-none
F95
Specify that no implicit typing is allowed, unless overridden by
explicit IMPLICIT statements
+ffixed-line-length-72
+F95 RejectNegative
+Use 72 character line width in fixed mode
+
ffixed-line-length-80
F95 RejectNegative
Use 80 character line width in fixed mode
Index: options.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 options.c
--- options.c 22 May 2004 11:03:17 -0000 1.5
+++ options.c 11 Jul 2004 12:22:06 -0000
@@ -260,6 +260,10 @@ gfc_handle_option (size_t scode, const c
gfc_option.flag_repack_arrays = value;
break;
+ case OPT_ffixed_line_length_72:
+ gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 72;
+ break;
+
case OPT_ffixed_line_length_80:
gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 80;
break;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-11 13:19 [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72 Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-11 13:34 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 14:49 ` Paul Brook
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-11 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Fortran mailing list; +Cc: patch
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> Trivial fix for that bug.
Trivial ChangeLog:
2004-07-11 Tobias Schlueter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de
PR fortran/16465
* lang.opt (ffixed-line-length-72): New option.
* options.c (gfc_handle_option): Handle option.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-11 13:19 [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72 Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 13:34 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-11 14:49 ` Paul Brook
2004-07-11 23:15 ` Tobias Schlüter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Brook @ 2004-07-11 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran; +Cc: Tobias Schlüter, patch
On Sunday 11 July 2004 13:29, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> Trivial fix for that bug.
>
> Built and verified that it works as expected. I didn't commit this as
> obvious, because someone might prefer if we allowed arbitrary line
> lengths, as in -ffixed-line-length-N, where N is an arbitrary positive
> integer. I can't see much value in that, but there might be.
The documentation (fortran/invoke.texi) implies that any value is allowed, so
either the code or the documentation needs fixing.
g77 supports arbitary lengths, so we probably should too.
You might want to fix -ffixed-line-length-none at the same time:)
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-11 14:49 ` Paul Brook
@ 2004-07-11 23:15 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-12 22:49 ` Toon Moene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-11 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Brook; +Cc: fortran, patch
Paul Brook wrote:
> The documentation (fortran/invoke.texi) implies that any value is allowed, so
> either the code or the documentation needs fixing.
Done as below. There is a difference from g77: g77 pads strings on
continued lines, i.e.
t = "STRING
1TEST"
will let t have a bunch of spaces between "STRING" and "TEST". We don't
do this, but since we never did, and noone complained, I guess that's no
issue.
>
> g77 supports arbitary lengths, so we probably should too.
If someone complains, I will.
>
> You might want to fix -ffixed-line-length-none at the same time:)
Done. Modulo the arbitrary linelengths :-)
Built on i686-pc-linux, I also checked that the new options work.
- Tobi
Index: invoke.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.4 invoke.texi
--- invoke.texi 4 Jul 2004 09:01:40 -0000 1.4
+++ invoke.texi 11 Jul 2004 18:35:23 -0000
@@ -191,26 +191,25 @@ older Fortran programs.
@cindex character set
Allow @samp{$} as a valid character in a symbol name.
-@cindex -ffixed-line-length-@var{n} option
-@cindex options, -ffixed-line-length-@var{n}
-@item -ffixed-line-length-@var{n}
+@cindex -ffixed-line-length-none option
+@cindex options, -ffixed-line-length-none
+@item -ffixed-line-length-none
@cindex source file format
@cindex lines, length
@cindex length of source lines
@cindex fixed form
@cindex limits, lengths of source lines
Set column after which characters are ignored in typical fixed-form
-lines in the source file, and through which spaces are assumed (as
-if padded to that length) after the ends of short fixed-form lines.
+lines in the source to the maximum value supported by
+@command{gfortran}, which by default is 132.
@cindex card image
@cindex extended-source option
Popular values for @var{n} include 72 (the
standard and the default), 80 (card image), and 132 (corresponds
to ``extended-source'' options in some popular compilers).
-@var{n} may be @samp{none}, meaning that the entire line is meaningful
-and that continued character constants never have implicit spaces appended
-to them to fill out the line.
+@var{n} may be @samp{none}, meaning the maximum value will be
+assumed. This value is a build-time constant and defaults to 132.
@option{-ffixed-line-length-0} means the same thing as
@option{-ffixed-line-length-none}.
Index: lang.opt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/lang.opt,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 lang.opt
--- lang.opt 11 Jul 2004 16:55:00 -0000 1.6
+++ lang.opt 11 Jul 2004 18:35:23 -0000
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ fimplicit-none
F95
Specify that no implicit typing is allowed, unless overridden by
explicit IMPLICIT statements
-ffixed-line-length-80
+ffixed-line-length-none
F95 RejectNegative
-Use 80 character line width in fixed mode
+Use maximum supported character line width in fixed mode
-ffixed-line-length-132
-F95 RejectNegative
-Use 132 character line width in fixed mode
+ffixed-line-length-
+F95 RejectNegative Joined UInteger
+-ffixed-line-length-<n> Use n as character line width in
fixed mode
fmax-identifier-length=
F95 RejectNegative Joined UInteger
Index: options.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 options.c
--- options.c 11 Jul 2004 16:55:00 -0000 1.7
+++ options.c 11 Jul 2004 18:35:23 -0000
@@ -260,12 +260,17 @@ gfc_handle_option (size_t scode, const c
gfc_option.flag_repack_arrays = value;
break;
- case OPT_ffixed_line_length_80:
- gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 80;
- break;
-
- case OPT_ffixed_line_length_132:
- gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 132;
+ case OPT_ffixed_line_length_none:
+ value = GFC_MAX_LINE;
+ /* Fall through ... */
+
+ case OPT_ffixed_line_length_:
+ if (value == 0)
+ value = GFC_MAX_LINE;
+ if (value > GFC_MAX_LINE)
+ gfc_fatal_error ("Maximum supported line length is %d",
+ GFC_MAX_LINE);
+ gfc_option.fixed_line_length = value;
break;
case OPT_fmax_identifier_length_:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-11 23:15 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-12 22:49 ` Toon Moene
2004-07-12 23:16 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-13 1:43 ` Tobias Schlüter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Toon Moene @ 2004-07-12 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Schlüter; +Cc: Paul Brook, fortran, patch
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> Paul Brook wrote:
>
>>The documentation (fortran/invoke.texi) implies that any value is allowed, so
>>either the code or the documentation needs fixing.
>
>
> Done as below. There is a difference from g77: g77 pads strings on
> continued lines, i.e.
> t = "STRING
> 1TEST"
> will let t have a bunch of spaces between "STRING" and "TEST". We don't
> do this, but since we never did, and noone complained, I guess that's no
> issue.
Not so fast - this is fixed form code, so every line is 72 characters
long. g77 was quite innovative in treating this right - IIRC, DEC
changed its compiler to match g77's behaviour.
--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-12 22:49 ` Toon Moene
@ 2004-07-12 23:16 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-12 23:21 ` Steve Kargl
2004-07-13 1:43 ` Tobias Schlüter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-12 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toon Moene; +Cc: Paul Brook, fortran, patch
Toon Moene wrote:
>>Done as below. There is a difference from g77: g77 pads strings on
>>continued lines, i.e.
>> t = "STRING
>> 1TEST"
>>will let t have a bunch of spaces between "STRING" and "TEST". We don't
>>do this, but since we never did, and noone complained, I guess that's no
>>issue.
>
>
> Not so fast - this is fixed form code, so every line is 72 characters
> long. g77 was quite innovative in treating this right - IIRC, DEC
> changed its compiler to match g77's behaviour.
>
Hm, g77 came out sometime in the 90ies, and this feature was an
innovation? I can't believe many people rely on this.
I guess this counts as a complaint, I will update my patch.
- Tobi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-12 23:16 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-12 23:21 ` Steve Kargl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kargl @ 2004-07-12 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Schl?ter; +Cc: Toon Moene, Paul Brook, fortran, patch
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:26:49PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Toon Moene wrote:
> >>Done as below. There is a difference from g77: g77 pads strings on
> >>continued lines, i.e.
> >> t = "STRING
> >> 1TEST"
> >>will let t have a bunch of spaces between "STRING" and "TEST". We don't
> >>do this, but since we never did, and noone complained, I guess that's no
> >>issue.
> >
> >
> > Not so fast - this is fixed form code, so every line is 72 characters
> > long. g77 was quite innovative in treating this right - IIRC, DEC
> > changed its compiler to match g77's behaviour.
> >
>
> Hm, g77 came out sometime in the 90ies, and this feature was an
> innovation? I can't believe many people rely on this.
>
> I guess this counts as a complaint, I will update my patch.
>
I'm not complaining, just offering a data point with NAG's compiler
and its dusty deck option.
troutmask:kargl[203] cat a.f
program a
character*100 t
t = "STRING
1TEST"
print *, t
end
troutmask:kargl[204] f95 -dusty -o a a.f
Obsolescent: a.f, line 1: Fixed source form
troutmask:kargl[205] ./a
STRING TEST
--
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-12 22:49 ` Toon Moene
2004-07-12 23:16 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-13 1:43 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-13 6:41 ` Bud Davis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-13 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toon Moene; +Cc: Paul Brook, fortran, patch
Toon Moene wrote:
>
> Not so fast - this is fixed form code, so every line is 72 characters
> long. g77 was quite innovative in treating this right - IIRC, DEC
> changed its compiler to match g77's behaviour.
>
I've updated my patch. But before I post it, I want to know: Is support
for arbitrary line lengths with --fixed-line-length-none also a must, or
is the builtin maximum of 132 ok? I just don't want to do that work
unnecessarily.
For writing a testcase, I'm interested in this: is there a way to
compile and run a testcase with several different options, and expect
different output each time, i.e.
character(400) :: t
t=
1"
2a"
print *, len_trim(t)+6
end
has this behavior:
option --ffixed-line-length-72 -> prints: 72
option --ffixed-line-length-132 -> prints: 132
option --ffixed-line-length-none -> prints: 7
etc.
- Tobi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-13 1:43 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-13 6:41 ` Bud Davis
2004-07-13 8:12 ` Tobias Schlüter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Bud Davis @ 2004-07-13 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Schlüter; +Cc: Toon Moene, Paul Brook, gfortran, patch
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 17:23, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> I've updated my patch. But before I post it, I want to know: Is
support
> for arbitrary line lengths with --fixed-line-length-none also a must,
yes.
i have used this feature in g7, not with human written code, but with
code written by programs.
--bud
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-13 6:41 ` Bud Davis
@ 2004-07-13 8:12 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-13 20:50 ` Tobias Schlüter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-13 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bud Davis; +Cc: Toon Moene, Paul Brook, gfortran, patch
Bud Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 17:23, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>>I've updated my patch. But before I post it, I want to know: Is support
>>for arbitrary line lengths with --fixed-line-length-none also a must,
>
> yes.
>
> i have used this feature in g77, not with human written code, but with
> code written by programs.
>
Argh! Ok, will do so tomorrow.
- Tobi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-13 8:12 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-13 20:50 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-19 4:21 ` Paul Brook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Schlüter @ 2004-07-13 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Schlüter; +Cc: Bud Davis, Toon Moene, Paul Brook, gfortran, patch
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> Bud Davis wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 17:23, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>>
>>>I've updated my patch. But before I post it, I want to know: Is support
>>>for arbitrary line lengths with --fixed-line-length-none also a must,
>>
>>yes.
>>
>>i have used this feature in g77, not with human written code, but with
>>code written by programs.
>>
>
>
> Argh! Ok, will do so tomorrow.
>
Updated patch below. There are no changes to invoke.texi because the
functionality is as documented now (except that the case in which no
meaningful Fortran program can be written, -ffixed-line-length-6 and
below, is not documented. I don't think that's a real omission)
There is a bug, but I verified that this is also present before my
patch: newlines inside statements confuse the parser. This is the reason
the g77 testcase ffixed-line-length-7.f doesn't work. I haven't yet
looked into how to fix this, and I think it is fairly orthogonal to this
patch. Apart from that one, I plan to commit the ffixed-line-length
tests from the g77 testsuite alongside this patch.
This also fixes a bug we had in the handling of preprocessor lines:
overlong preprocessor lines would get written to unallocated memory,
this is fixed by appropriately resizing the line buffer along the way.
- Tobi
2004-07-13 Tobias Schlueter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
PR fortran/16465
* lang.opt (ffixed-line-length-none, ffixed-line-length-): New
options.
(ffixed-line-length-80, ffixed-line-length-132): Remove.
* options.c (gfc_handle_options): Deal with changed options.
* scanner.c (load_line): Change second arg to 'char **',
allocate if pointing to NULL. Keep track of buffer's length.
Adapt buffer size to overlong lines. Pad lines to full length
in fixed form.
(load_file): Adapt to new interface of load_line.
Index: lang.opt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/lang.opt,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 lang.opt
--- lang.opt 11 Jul 2004 16:55:00 -0000 1.6
+++ lang.opt 13 Jul 2004 13:15:13 -0000
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ fimplicit-none
F95
Specify that no implicit typing is allowed, unless overridden by
explicit IMPLICIT statements
-ffixed-line-length-80
+ffixed-line-length-none
F95 RejectNegative
-Use 80 character line width in fixed mode
+Use maximum supported character line width in fixed mode
-ffixed-line-length-132
-F95 RejectNegative
-Use 132 character line width in fixed mode
+ffixed-line-length-
+F95 RejectNegative Joined UInteger
+-ffixed-line-length-<n> Use n as character line width in
fixed mode
fmax-identifier-length=
F95 RejectNegative Joined UInteger
Index: options.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/options.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 options.c
--- options.c 11 Jul 2004 16:55:00 -0000 1.7
+++ options.c 13 Jul 2004 13:15:13 -0000
@@ -260,12 +260,14 @@ gfc_handle_option (size_t scode, const c
gfc_option.flag_repack_arrays = value;
break;
- case OPT_ffixed_line_length_80:
- gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 80;
+ case OPT_ffixed_line_length_none:
+ gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 0;
break;
- case OPT_ffixed_line_length_132:
- gfc_option.fixed_line_length = 132;
+ case OPT_ffixed_line_length_:
+ if (value != 0 && value < 7)
+ gfc_fatal_error ("Fixed line length must be at least seven.");
+ gfc_option.fixed_line_length = value;
break;
case OPT_fmax_identifier_length_:
Index: scanner.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/fortran/scanner.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 scanner.c
--- scanner.c 21 Jun 2004 22:22:32 -0000 1.6
+++ scanner.c 13 Jul 2004 13:15:14 -0000
@@ -671,26 +671,49 @@ gfc_gobble_whitespace (void)
}
-/* Load a single line into the buffer. We truncate lines that are too
- long. In fixed mode, we expand a tab that occurs within the
- statement label region to expand to spaces that leave the next
- character in the source region. */
+/* Load a single line into pbuf.
+
+ If pbuf points to a NULL pointer, it is allocated.
+ We truncate lines that are too long, unless we're dealing with
+ preprocessor lines or if the option -ffixed-line-length-none is set,
+ in which case we reallocate the buffer to fit the entire line, if
+ need be.
+ In fixed mode, we expand a tab that occurs within the statement
+ label region to expand to spaces that leave the next character in
+ the source region. */
static void
-load_line (FILE * input, char *buffer, char *filename, int linenum)
+load_line (FILE * input, char **pbuf, char *filename, int linenum)
{
int c, maxlen, i, trunc_flag, preprocessor_flag;
+ static int buflen = 0;
+ char *buffer;
+
+ /* Detemine the maximum allowed line length. */
+ if (gfc_current_form == FORM_FREE)
+ maxlen = GFC_MAX_LINE;
+ else
+ maxlen = gfc_option.fixed_line_length;
- maxlen = (gfc_current_form == FORM_FREE)
- ? 132
- : gfc_option.fixed_line_length;
+ if (*pbuf == NULL)
+ {
+ /* Allocate the line buffer, storing its length into buflen. */
+ if (maxlen > 0)
+ buflen = maxlen;
+ else
+ buflen = GFC_MAX_LINE;
+
+ *pbuf = gfc_getmem (buflen + 1);
+ }
i = 0;
+ buffer = *pbuf;
preprocessor_flag = 0;
c = fgetc (input);
if (c == '#')
- /* Don't truncate preprocessor lines. */
+ /* In order to not truncate preprocessor lines, we have to
+ remember that this is one. */
preprocessor_flag = 1;
ungetc (c, input);
@@ -729,8 +752,17 @@ load_line (FILE * input, char *buffer, c
*buffer++ = c;
i++;
- if (i >= maxlen && !preprocessor_flag)
- { /* Truncate the rest of the line. */
+ if (i >= buflen && (maxlen == 0 || preprocessor_flag))
+ {
+ /* Reallocate line buffer to double size to hold the
+ overlong line. */
+ buflen = buflen * 2;
+ *pbuf = xrealloc (*pbuf, buflen);
+ buffer = (*pbuf)+i;
+ }
+ else if (i >= buflen)
+ {
+ /* Truncate the rest of the line. */
trunc_flag = 1;
for (;;)
@@ -753,6 +785,14 @@ load_line (FILE * input, char *buffer, c
}
}
+ /* Pad lines to the selected line length in fixed form. */
+ if (gfc_current_form == FORM_FIXED
+ && gfc_option.fixed_line_length > 0
+ && !preprocessor_flag
+ && c != EOF)
+ while (i++ < buflen)
+ *buffer++ = ' ';
+
*buffer = '\0';
}
@@ -925,7 +965,7 @@ include_line (char *line)
static try
load_file (char *filename, bool initial)
{
- char line[GFC_MAX_LINE+1];
+ char *line;
gfc_linebuf *b;
gfc_file *f;
FILE *input;
@@ -963,10 +1003,11 @@ load_file (char *filename, bool initial)
f->up = current_file;
current_file = f;
current_file->line = 1;
+ line = NULL;
for (;;)
{
- load_line (input, line, filename, current_file->line);
+ load_line (input, &line, filename, current_file->line);
len = strlen (line);
if (feof (input) && len == 0)
@@ -1003,6 +1044,9 @@ load_file (char *filename, bool initial)
line_tail = b;
}
+ /* Release the line buffer allocated in load_line. */
+ gfc_free (line);
+
fclose (input);
current_file = current_file->up;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
2004-07-13 20:50 ` Tobias Schlüter
@ 2004-07-19 4:21 ` Paul Brook
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Brook @ 2004-07-19 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran; +Cc: Tobias Schlüter, patch
> 2004-07-13 Tobias Schlueter <tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
>
> PR fortran/16465
> * lang.opt (ffixed-line-length-none, ffixed-line-length-): New
> options.
> (ffixed-line-length-80, ffixed-line-length-132): Remove.
> * options.c (gfc_handle_options): Deal with changed options.
> * scanner.c (load_line): Change second arg to 'char **',
> allocate if pointing to NULL. Keep track of buffer's length.
> Adapt buffer size to overlong lines. Pad lines to full length
> in fixed form.
> (load_file): Adapt to new interface of load_line.
Ok.
We should probably allow arbitrary length lines as an extension in free-form
mode, but that can be done separately.
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* RE: [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72
@ 2004-07-13 8:15 Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) @ 2004-07-13 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias Schlüter, Toon Moene; +Cc: Paul Brook, fortran, patch
Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> I've updated my patch. But before I post it, I want to know: Is
> support for arbitrary line lengths with --fixed-line-length-none also
> a must, or is the builtin maximum of 132 ok? I just don't want to do
> that work unnecessarily.
Tobi,
I couldn't find a way. I tried a few fancy ways before I settled on the
very simple tests in g77.dg/ffixed-line-length-*.f.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-18 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-11 13:19 [gofrtran] Fix PR 16465: accept -ffixed-line-length-72 Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 13:34 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-11 14:49 ` Paul Brook
2004-07-11 23:15 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-12 22:49 ` Toon Moene
2004-07-12 23:16 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-12 23:21 ` Steve Kargl
2004-07-13 1:43 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-13 6:41 ` Bud Davis
2004-07-13 8:12 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-13 20:50 ` Tobias Schlüter
2004-07-19 4:21 ` Paul Brook
2004-07-13 8:15 Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).