public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied?
@ 2004-10-15  4:24 Paul Schlie
  2004-10-15  4:33 ` Andrew Pinski
  2004-10-15 17:21 ` Kelley Cook
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Schlie @ 2004-10-15  4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

The combine.c portion of the patch from:

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00843.html

doesn't seem to have been applied to 3.4 branch?

(assuming it was meant to be)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied?
  2004-10-15  4:24 combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied? Paul Schlie
@ 2004-10-15  4:33 ` Andrew Pinski
  2004-10-15  5:51   ` Paul Schlie
  2004-10-15 17:21 ` Kelley Cook
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2004-10-15  4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Schlie; +Cc: gcc-patches


On Oct 15, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Paul Schlie wrote:

> The combine.c portion of the patch from:
>
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00843.html
>
> doesn't seem to have been applied to 3.4 branch?
>
> (assuming it was meant to be)

Huh, are you sure that you don't have a tag or if you are
using a mirror of the cvs server it is uptodate?

Because this was applied, messages to gcc-cvs don't happen
unless it was.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied?
  2004-10-15  4:33 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2004-10-15  5:51   ` Paul Schlie
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Schlie @ 2004-10-15  5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Pinski; +Cc: gcc-patches

From cvs-web of the 4.3 branch as of a few moments ago (below), the latest
revision shown for combine.c on the 3.4 branch is 1.4, last updated several
months ago, while the other files referenced in the patch properly show as
being revised a only a few days ago by the submitted patch in the same 3.4
branch listing.

----
File:  [gcc] / gcc / gcc / combine.c (download)
Revision 1.400, Mon Jan 12 19:42:42 2004 UTC (9 months ago) by pinskia
Branch: MAIN 
CVS Tags: gcc-ss-3_4-20040121, gcc-3_5-integration-branchpoint,
gcc-3_5-integration-branch, gcc-3_4-branchpoint, gcc-3_4-branch
Changes since 1.399: +44 -35  lines

2004-01-12  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>

        PR optimization/12508.
        * combine.c (try_combine): Remove a dead set in a parallel
        even if its destination is a subreg.

        Revert:
        2003-06-03  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
        * combine.c (simplify_set): Don't move a subreg in SET_SRC to
        SET_DEST if WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS is not defined.

----
File:  [gcc] / gcc / gcc / regs.h (download)
Revision 1.31.4.1, Tue Oct 12 23:35:32 2004 UTC (2 days, 5 hours ago) by rth
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes since 1.31: +0 -2  lines

        PR rtl-opt/17503
        * regclass.c (subregs_of_mode): Turn into an htab.  Make static.
        (som_hash, som_eq): New.
        (init_subregs_of_mode, record_subregs_of_mode): New.
        (cannot_change_mode_set_regs): Rewrite for htab implementation.
        (invalid_mode_change_p): Likewise.
        * combine.c (gen_lowpart_for_combine): Use record_subregs_of_mode.
        * flow.c (mark_used_regs): Likewise.
        (life_analysis): Use init_subregs_of_mode.
        * regs.h (subregs_of_mode): Remove.
        * rtl.h (init_subregs_of_mode, record_subregs_of_mode): Declare.

----
(assuming that cvs-web is reasonably representative of the state of cvs for
the 3.4 branch)

Sorry if I've drawn an inappropriate conclusion,

-paul-

> From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:30:07 -0400
> To: Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net>
> Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied?
> 
> 
> On Oct 15, 2004, at 12:19 AM, Paul Schlie wrote:
> 
>> The combine.c portion of the patch from:
>> 
>>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00843.html
>> 
>> doesn't seem to have been applied to 3.4 branch?
>> 
>> (assuming it was meant to be)
> 
> Huh, are you sure that you don't have a tag or if you are
> using a mirror of the cvs server it is uptodate?
> 
> Because this was applied, messages to gcc-cvs don't happen
> unless it was.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied?
  2004-10-15  4:24 combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied? Paul Schlie
  2004-10-15  4:33 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2004-10-15 17:21 ` Kelley Cook
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kelley Cook @ 2004-10-15 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Schlie; +Cc: GCC Patches

> The combine.c portion of the patch from:
> 
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-10/msg00843.html
> 
> doesn't seem to have been applied to 3.4 branch?
> 
> (assuming it was meant to be)

It was applied, you can can click on the combine.c link in the 
cvs log message and see that it was.  

What you are seeing, is believed to be a deficiency with our version of cvsweb.

See PR gcc/14561 (http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14561)

KC

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-15 16:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-15  4:24 combine.c portion of patch to 3.4 branch not applied? Paul Schlie
2004-10-15  4:33 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-10-15  5:51   ` Paul Schlie
2004-10-15 17:21 ` Kelley Cook

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).