From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-131510-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17725 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2004 12:06:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17718 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 12:06:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 12:06:16 -0000
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CKbhv-0002Z4-00
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:06:15 +0200
Received: from 203.107.212.244 ([203.107.212.244])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:06:15 +0200
Received: from lerdsuwa by 203.107.212.244 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:06:15 +0200
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sf.net>
Subject: Re: [C++] My unreviewed patch
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4177A8E3.1050008@users.sf.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0410201750220.7948-100000@localhost.localdomain> <10b401c4b6d0$08dadb30$f503030a@mimas>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.107.212.244
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01824.txt.bz2

Giovanni Bajo wrote

 > Tue Oct 19 22:58:28 2004
 > ***************
 > *** 1,4 ****
 > ! // { dg-do run }
 >  // Test that template friends referring to class template members are
 >  // respected.
 >
 > --- 1,4 ----
 > ! // { dg-do compile }
 >  // Test that template friends referring to class template members are
 >  // respected.
 >
 >
 > Why? Didn't this use to be a run testcase?

Thanks, I've fixed the typos in memfriend11.C and memfriend14.C testcases.
Regarding the friend44.C test above, access checking problems are caught
during compile time.  And because it failed with bogus error message and
never compiled nor ran, we don't lose anything changing it to compilation-only test.

--Kriang