From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 321F93858D1E
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri,  2 Sep 2022 08:30:07 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 321F93858D1E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com
Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22B233E6A;
	Fri,  2 Sep 2022 04:30:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.20.5.85] (unknown [203.142.74.244])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93C4A33E6F;
	Fri,  2 Sep 2022 04:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 10:29:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOCS] gcc-13: document removal of STABS
In-Reply-To: <23a1700c-c450-a7ac-dcd5-1f920d5d2ad0@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <42e46e1c-f975-47dc-f2ec-e747186a450a@pfeifer.com>
References: <23a1700c-c450-a7ac-dcd5-1f920d5d2ad0@suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-1458508846-1662107404=:10886"
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.143
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323328-1458508846-1662107404=:10886
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

Hi Martin,

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, Martin Liška wrote:
> +    <li>The support for emitting the STABS debugging format has been removed
> +      (includes <code>-gstabs</code> and <code>-gxcoff</code> options) which means
> +      the support for <strong>dbx</strong> debugger is removed.</li>

how about slightly rephrasing this and breaking up the sentence for easier 
consumption?

   <li>Support for emitting the STABS debugging format (including the
     <code>-gstabs</code> and <code>-gxcoff</code> options) has been removed.
     (This means the <strong>dbx</strong> debugger is no longer 
     supported, either.)</li>

Just a suggestion, feel free to take what you like (only the removals and 
addition of "the" should stay.)

And if you have an idea how to phrase my second sentence a little nicer, 
absolutely go for it.

Thanks,
Gerald
--8323328-1458508846-1662107404=:10886--