From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20175 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2018 21:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20164 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2018 21:43:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:479 X-HELO: mail-qt1-f171.google.com Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qt1-f171.google.com) (209.85.160.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:43:09 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id t13so2322735qtn.3 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 13:43:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.149] (209-6-216-142.s141.c3-0.smr-cbr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcncustomer.com. [209.6.216.142]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s36sm1203504qth.17.2018.12.06.13.43.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Dec 2018 13:43:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: C++ patch ping To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20181204144721.GA12380@tucnak> From: Jason Merrill Message-ID: <431da9cd-3179-b457-1f8a-0030099a3184@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181204144721.GA12380@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2 On 12/4/18 9:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping > PR87506 - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01758.html > > You've acked the patch with the asserts but that FAILs as mentioned > in the above mail. The following has been bootstrapped/regtested > and works, can it be committed without those asserts and let those > be handled incrementally later (though, I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough > with resolving those). OK> Jason