From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1096 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2016 20:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1083 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jun 2016 20:21:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=jacob, rep.dot.nop@gmail.com, repdotnopgmailcom, Jacob X-HELO: resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:21:12 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.243]) by resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id EjD5bPm7oBNj9EjDSbJg05; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:21:10 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 8kM91t0045N1HX401kM9Q5; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:21:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR52665 do not let .ident confuse assembler scan tests From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <1466278273-7014-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 20:21:00 -0000 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Rainer Orth Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44774FBA-55E9-4CBB-8EB3-0C67BCC09E62@comcast.net> References: <1466278273-7014-1-git-send-email-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg01365.txt.bz2 On Jun 18, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >=20 > A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers > inappropriate FAIL. > The patch below adds -fno-ident if a testcase contains one of > scan-assembler, scan-assembler-not or scan-assembler-times. Kinda gross. I'd like to consensus build a little, as I don't know that I = have a better solution than the solution you propose to fix the issue. I'd= love it if one or more of Jacob, Law and Richard can chime in on direction= here. I'll have to think about this some more and see if I can come up wi= th something that I like better. If no one has a better solution, I'll approve the proposed solution. Let's= give people a little time to chime in.