From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15665 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2011 18:00:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 15647 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2011 18:00:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:00:28 +0000 Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zV4J1f0051bwxycAAW0TDw; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:00:27 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.8]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zW0R1f00e0BKwT48eW0STP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:00:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Unreviewed testsuite patches Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:49:00 -0000 Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Janis Johnson , Arnaud Charlet , Richard Guenther Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44EE7EC2-A9C9-4A76-B47F-7C4B0CE01C3B@comcast.net> References: To: Rainer Orth X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01673.txt.bz2 On Jan 24, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Two larger testsuite patches of mine have remained unreviewed for some > time: My take, once the technical side (non-dejagnu) is reviewed and approved, th= e work should just go in. I'd look to the SC to elaborate on what the righ= t approach is. Sitting around for a global person for testsuite fixes and = additions, is, well, silly.