public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] c++: fix broken conversion in coroutines
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:44:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44f278ec-e4c2-91db-aae1-6e5b4809a652@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2f23c31-90b3-b73c-0bec-d8f2c94e5bb9@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

On 10/3/22 23:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 9/30/22 18:50, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>>> On 30 Sep 2022, at 23:06, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You can't use CONVERT_EXPR to convert between two class types, and it 
>>> was
>>> breaking copy elision.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this patch breaks symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C, where
>>> susp_type is Loopy<int>::handle_type.  How is this supposed to work?
>>
>> We are trying to save a type-erased handle (which the symmetric 
>> transfer makes
>> and indirect call through, nothing else).
> 
> The problem is you're treating one class directly as another class here, 
> without the indirection involved in usual type-erasure idioms.
> 
> It does seem that the gimplifier handles this fine, but it doesn't 
> correspond to anything in the language and much of the front end assumes 
> that CONVERT_EXPR is only used for scalars.  VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR would 
> better express that we're not doing anything to the value, just cheating 
> the type system.  That's still dodgy from a language perspective, but 
> probably safe enough in this case.

So I'm applying this:

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-c-fix-broken-conversion-in-coroutines.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1891 bytes --]

From 0cd9dafcfa8cf69b3a1eae91bea82d388c5328d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 10:04:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] c++: fix broken conversion in coroutines
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

You can't use CONVERT_EXPR to convert between two class types.

VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR takes liberties with the C++ type system, but is probably
safe in this context.  Let's also only use it when the type isn't already
what we want.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* coroutines.cc (expand_one_await_expression): Change conversion
	to VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR.
	* cp-gimplify.cc (cp_genericize_r) [CONVERT_EXPR]: Add assert.
---
 gcc/cp/coroutines.cc  | 5 ++++-
 gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc | 1 +
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
index eca01abcb7a..60b846600b9 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
@@ -1728,7 +1728,10 @@ expand_one_await_expression (tree *stmt, tree *await_expr, void *d)
     }
   else
     {
-      r = build1_loc (loc, CONVERT_EXPR, void_coro_handle_type, suspend);
+      r = suspend;
+      if (!same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (susp_type,
+						      void_coro_handle_type))
+	r = build1_loc (loc, VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, void_coro_handle_type, r);
       r = build2_loc (loc, INIT_EXPR, void_coro_handle_type, data->conthand, r);
       r = build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, void_type_node, r);
       append_to_statement_list (r, &body_list);
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
index b4599fc34d8..5d26e59d098 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc
@@ -1589,6 +1589,7 @@ cp_genericize_r (tree *stmt_p, int *walk_subtrees, void *data)
       break;
 
     case CONVERT_EXPR:
+      gcc_checking_assert (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (stmt)));
       gcc_assert (!CONVERT_EXPR_VBASE_PATH (stmt));
       break;
 
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-06 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-30 22:06 Jason Merrill
2022-09-30 22:50 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-10-04  3:53   ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-06 21:44     ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-10-06 22:47       ` Iain Sandoe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44f278ec-e4c2-91db-aae1-6e5b4809a652@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).