From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] v2 [PATCH 1/13] Add support for per-location warning groups (PR 74765)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:28:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4514e92d166a007cdfd6b971a69a295a4d8b6891.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c39b173153abdaaca3a22b358c0d6aa645ea2b83.camel@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 19:18 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-04 at 15:41 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > The attached patch introduces the suppress_warning(),
> > warning_suppressed(), and copy_no_warning() APIs without making
> > use of them in the rest of GCC. They are in three files:
> >
> > diagnostic-spec.{h,c}: Location-centric overloads.
> > warning-control.cc: Tree- and gimple*-centric overloads.
> >
> > The location-centric overloads are suitable to use from the
> > diagnostic
> > subsystem. The rest can be used from the front ends and the middle
> > end.
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > +/* Return true if warning OPT is suppressed for decl/expression
> > EXPR.
> > + By default tests the disposition for any warning. */
> > +
> > +bool
> > +warning_suppressed_p (const_tree expr, opt_code opt /* =
> > all_warnings */)
> > +{
> > + const nowarn_spec_t *spec = get_nowarn_spec (expr);
> > +
> > + if (!spec)
> > + return get_no_warning_bit (expr);
> > +
> > + const nowarn_spec_t optspec (opt);
> > + bool dis = *spec & optspec;
> > + gcc_assert (get_no_warning_bit (expr) || !dis);
> > + return dis;
>
> Looking through the patch, I don't like the use of "dis" for the "is
> suppressed" bool, since...
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > +
> > +/* Enable, or by default disable, a warning for the statement STMT.
> > + The wildcard OPT of -1 controls all warnings. */
>
> ...I find the above comment to be confusingly worded due to the double-
> negative.
>
> If I'm reading your intent correctly, how about this wording:
>
> /* Change the supression of warnings for statement STMT.
> OPT controls which warnings are affected.
> The wildcard OPT of -1 controls all warnings.
> If SUPP is true (the default), enable the suppression of the
> warnings.
> If SUPP is false, disable the suppression of the warnings. */
>
> ...and rename "dis" to "supp".
>
> Or have I misread the intent of the patch?
>
> > +
> > +void
> > +suppress_warning (gimple *stmt, opt_code opt /* = all_warnings */,
> > + bool dis /* = true */)
>
> > +{
> > + if (opt == no_warning)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + const key_type_t key = convert_to_key (stmt);
> > +
> > + dis = suppress_warning_at (key, opt, dis) || dis;
> > + set_no_warning_bit (stmt, dis);
> > +}
>
> [...snip...]
Also, I think I prefer having a separate entrypoints for the "all
warnings" case; on reading through the various patches I think that in
e.g.:
- TREE_NO_WARNING (*expr_p) = 1;
+ suppress_warning (*expr_p);
I prefer:
suppress_warnings (*expr_p);
(note the plural) since that way we can grep for them, and it seems
like better grammar to me.
Both entrypoints could be implemented by a static suppress_warning_1
internally if that makes it easier.
In that vein, "unsuppress_warning" seems far clearer to me that
"suppress_warning (FOO, false)"; IIRC there are very few uses of this
non-default arg (I couldn't find any in a quick look through the v2
kit).
Does this make sense?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-24 22:02 [PATCH 0/11] warning control by group and location " Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:07 ` [PATCH 1/11] introduce xxx_no_warning APIs Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in Ada Martin Sebor
2021-05-25 8:59 ` Eric Botcazou
2021-05-27 20:29 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:10 ` [PATCH 3/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in C Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:11 ` [PATCH 4/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in C family Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:11 ` [PATCH 5/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in C++ Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:12 ` [PATCH 6/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in Fortran Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:13 ` [PATCH 7/11] " Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:14 ` [PATCH 8/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in Objective-C Martin Sebor
2021-05-25 14:01 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-05-25 15:48 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-25 15:56 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-05-24 22:15 ` [PATCH 9/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in rl78 back end Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:16 ` [PATCH 10/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in libcc1 Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 22:16 ` [PATCH 11/11] use xxx_no_warning APIs in the middle end Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 23:08 ` David Malcolm
2021-05-25 0:44 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-24 23:08 ` [PATCH 0/11] warning control by group and location (PR 74765) David Malcolm
2021-05-25 0:42 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-25 9:04 ` Richard Biener
2021-05-25 20:50 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-27 11:19 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-05-27 16:41 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-27 21:55 ` David Malcolm
2021-05-28 4:40 ` Jason Merrill
2021-06-04 21:27 ` [PATCH 0/13] v2 " Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:41 ` [PATCH 1/13] v2 [PATCH 1/13] Add support for per-location warning groups " Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:34 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-22 23:18 ` [PATCH " David Malcolm
2021-06-22 23:28 ` David Malcolm [this message]
2021-06-23 19:47 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:26 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-25 1:34 ` Martin Sebor
2021-09-01 19:35 ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-09-02 0:14 ` Martin Sebor
2021-09-03 19:16 ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-09-10 7:45 ` [PING] Don't maintain a warning spec for 'UNKNOWN_LOCATION'/'BUILTINS_LOCATION' [PR101574] (was: [PATCH 1/13] v2 [PATCH 1/13] Add support for per-location warning groups (PR 74765)) Thomas Schwinge
2021-09-13 14:00 ` Jeff Law
2021-11-09 14:18 ` Use 'location_hash' for 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' " Thomas Schwinge
2021-11-15 15:01 ` [ping] Use 'location_hash' for 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' Thomas Schwinge
2021-11-15 16:43 ` Martin Sebor
2021-11-09 10:28 ` Get rid of infinite recursion for 'typedef' used with GTY-marked 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' [PR101204] (was: [PATCH 1/13] v2 [PATCH 1/13] Add support for per-location warning groups (PR 74765)) Thomas Schwinge
2021-11-09 10:54 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-09 12:25 ` Get rid of infinite recursion for 'typedef' used with GTY-marked 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' [PR101204, PR103157] Thomas Schwinge
2021-11-10 4:52 ` Get rid of infinite recursion for 'typedef' used with GTY-marked 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' [PR101204] Martin Sebor
2021-11-24 10:28 ` 'gengtype' (was: Get rid of infinite recursion for 'typedef' used with GTY-marked 'gcc/diagnostic-spec.h:nowarn_map' [PR101204]) Thomas Schwinge
2021-06-04 21:41 ` [PATCH 2/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in Ada Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:07 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-28 21:20 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:41 ` [PATCH 3/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in C front end Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:35 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:09 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-25 1:35 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:42 ` [PATCH 4/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in C family code Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:35 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:06 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-25 1:36 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:42 ` [PATCH 5/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in the RL78 back end Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:06 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-04 21:42 ` [PATCH 6/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in the C++ front end Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:37 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:12 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-25 1:38 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:42 ` [PATCH 7/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in the FORTRAN " Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:42 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:05 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-28 21:21 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:42 ` [PATCH 8/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in libcc1 Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:04 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-28 21:22 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:43 ` [PATCH 9/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in LTO Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:54 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 9:32 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-24 15:27 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-25 7:46 ` Richard Biener
2021-06-24 5:03 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-04 21:43 ` [PATCH 10/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in the middle end Martin Sebor
2021-06-21 21:58 ` [PING][PATCH " Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:15 ` [PATCH " Jeff Law
2021-06-25 1:40 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:43 ` [PATCH 11/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in the Objective-C front end Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:02 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-28 21:22 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-04 21:43 ` [PATCH 12/13] v2 Remove TREE_NO_WARNING and gimple*no_warning* APIs Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 5:01 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-04 21:43 ` [PATCH 13/13] v2 Add regression tests for PR 74765 and 74762 Martin Sebor
2021-06-24 4:56 ` Jeff Law
2021-06-28 21:23 ` Martin Sebor
2021-06-15 1:29 ` [PING][PATCH 0/13] v2 warning control by group and location (PR 74765) Martin Sebor
2021-07-17 20:36 ` [PATCH " Jan-Benedict Glaw
2021-07-19 15:08 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-28 11:14 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-28 16:16 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-29 8:26 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-07-29 14:41 ` Martin Sebor
2021-05-30 2:06 ` [PATCH 0/11] " Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4514e92d166a007cdfd6b971a69a295a4d8b6891.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).