* C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline
@ 2007-01-08 13:49 Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-01-08 14:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez @ 2007-01-08 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc, gcc-patches
Dear all,
It seems I managed to mess up the patch applied to revision 120558.
The problem is that somehow all testcases have been added three times.
I cannot imagine how such thing happenned.
Anyway, I will fix it today as soon as I put my hands in my laptop. Is
it better to revert and re-apply the original patch or just fix the
testcases? I would guess that the former is the better since the
original patch bootstrapped and regression tested without problems.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Manuel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline
2007-01-08 13:49 C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
@ 2007-01-08 14:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2007-01-08 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez, GCC Development, GCC Patches
> It seems I managed to mess up the patch applied to revision 120558.
> The problem is that somehow all testcases have been added three times.
> I cannot imagine how such thing happenned.
You probably used "patch" which, instead of warning if a patch creates a
file that is already there, happily puts the content of the file again
at the beginning of it.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-08 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-08 13:49 C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-01-08 14:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).