* Fix FRV's reg_or_0_operand predicate
@ 2007-01-08 9:44 Nick Clifton
2007-01-08 11:04 ` Aldy Hernandez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2007-01-08 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: aldyh, aoliva; +Cc: gcc-patches
Hi Aldy, Hi Alex,
I am going to apply the patch below to fix an "obvious" problem with
the FRV port. Namely that the reg_or_0_operand predicate is
intended to work with CONST_DOUBLES (amongst other rtx types) but
its definition was not allowing them.
I think that this patch ought to be applied to the 4.2 and 4.1
branches as well, but I am not sure if it counts as a regression.
What do you think ?
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2007-01-08 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
* config/frv/predicates.md (reg_or_0_operand): Accept
CONST_DOUBLEs.
Index: gcc/config/frv/predicates.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/frv/predicates.md (revision 120570)
+++ gcc/config/frv/predicates.md (working copy)
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@
;; appropriate type.
(define_predicate "reg_or_0_operand"
- (match_code "reg,subreg,const_int")
+ (match_code "reg,subreg,const_int,const_double")
{
switch (GET_CODE (op))
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix FRV's reg_or_0_operand predicate
2007-01-08 9:44 Fix FRV's reg_or_0_operand predicate Nick Clifton
@ 2007-01-08 11:04 ` Aldy Hernandez
2007-01-08 15:08 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2007-01-08 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: aoliva, gcc-patches
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:44:36AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Aldy, Hi Alex,
>
> I am going to apply the patch below to fix an "obvious" problem with
> the FRV port. Namely that the reg_or_0_operand predicate is
> intended to work with CONST_DOUBLES (amongst other rtx types) but
> its definition was not allowing them.
>
> I think that this patch ought to be applied to the 4.2 and 4.1
> branches as well, but I am not sure if it counts as a regression.
> What do you think ?
I'm OK with applying to the branches.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix FRV's reg_or_0_operand predicate
2007-01-08 11:04 ` Aldy Hernandez
@ 2007-01-08 15:08 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2007-01-08 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aldy Hernandez; +Cc: aoliva, gcc-patches
Hi Aldy,
>> I think that this patch ought to be applied to the 4.2 and 4.1
>> branches as well, but I am not sure if it counts as a regression.
>> What do you think ?
>
> I'm OK with applying to the branches.
Thanks - I have applied the patch to both branches.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-08 15:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-08 9:44 Fix FRV's reg_or_0_operand predicate Nick Clifton
2007-01-08 11:04 ` Aldy Hernandez
2007-01-08 15:08 ` Nick Clifton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).