From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21495 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2007 21:00:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 21474 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2007 21:00:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exsmtp02.agrinet.ch (HELO exsmtp02.agrinet.ch) (81.221.252.201) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:00:13 +0000 Received: from smtp.messaging.ch ([10.50.252.215]) by exsmtp02.agrinet.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 22:00:09 +0100 Received: from [192.168.225.5] ([84.73.68.225]) by smtp.messaging.ch with id 8l0b1W0014rcz700000000 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:00:37 +0100 X-IMP: RBL MAPS_ORDB: 0.00,RBL SPAMCOP: 0.00,RBL SBL+XBL: 0.00,RBL SORBS: 0.10,URL RHS: 0.00,URL SURBL: 0.00 Message-ID: <45A2B0C7.6070404@pop.agri.ch> Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:00:00 -0000 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton CC: dj@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00607.txt.bz2 Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi DJ, > > I have applied the patch below on behalf of Kai Tietz. This was > part of a larger patch that allows the x86_64 mingw port to use > either mingw32 or mingw64 as the third part of the triplet: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00235.html > > Am I correct in assuming that your synchronisation scripts will > bring this change into the sourceware repository, or should I apply > the patch there as well ? > > Cheers > Nick > > ChangeLog > 2007-01-08 Kai Tietz > > * configure.in: Add support for an x86_64-mingw* target. Don't you need to regenerate configure ? Btw, which version of autoconf do we use now? Andreas