* [PING] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks
@ 2007-02-10 15:10 Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-02-18 11:48 ` [PING^2] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez @ 2007-02-10 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02533.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PING^2] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks
2007-02-10 15:10 [PING] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks Manuel López-Ibáñez
@ 2007-02-18 11:48 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-03-01 18:15 ` [PING^3] [C++] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez @ 2007-02-18 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
On 10/02/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02533.html
Thanks,
Manuel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PING^3] [C++] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks
2007-02-18 11:48 ` [PING^2] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
@ 2007-03-01 18:15 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-03-02 4:26 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Manuel López-Ibáñez @ 2007-03-01 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Mark Mitchell, Nathan Sidwell
Following discussion with Mark Mitchell.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02320.html
PING^3: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02533.html
Thanks,
Manuel.
On 18/02/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/02/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02533.html
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Manuel.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING^3] [C++] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks
2007-03-01 18:15 ` [PING^3] [C++] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
@ 2007-03-02 4:26 ` Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2007-03-02 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez; +Cc: gcc-patches, Nathan Sidwell
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Following discussion with Mark Mitchell.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02320.html
>
> PING^3: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg02533.html
> - switch (parser->in_statement)
> + switch (parser->in_statement & ~IN_IF_STMT)
> {
> case 0:
> error ("break statement not within loop or switch");
> break;
> default:
> - gcc_assert ((parser->in_statement & IN_SWITCH_STMT)
> - || parser->in_statement == IN_ITERATION_STMT);
> + gcc_assert (((parser->in_statement & ~IN_IF_STMT) & IN_SWITCH_STMT)
> + || (parser->in_statement & ~IN_IF_STMT) == IN_ITERATION_STMT);
Please create a temporary for parser->in_statement & ~IN_IF_STMT, so
that you don't need to add that & ~IN_IF_STMT in all uses. The patch is
OK with that change; please update and check in.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-02 4:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-10 15:10 [PING] PR 15787 Poor error message with if and blocks Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-02-18 11:48 ` [PING^2] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-03-01 18:15 ` [PING^3] [C++] " Manuel López-Ibáñez
2007-03-02 4:26 ` Mark Mitchell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).