From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++, v2: Fix constexpr evaluation of parameters passed by invisible reference [PR111284]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:38:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45e52f2a-113c-4e7f-a491-5fff76041d17@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZifZWdsMDJipfNzK@tucnak>
On 4/23/24 08:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:19:36PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> They weren't the same, one was trying to evaluate the convert_from_reference
>> with vc_glvalue, the other evaluates it without that and with vc_prvalue.
>> Now, I guess the
>> + /* Undo convert_for_arg_passing work here. */
>> + if (TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (x))
>> + && !same_type_p (type, TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (x))))
>> + x = cp_fold_convert (build_reference_type (type), x);
>> part could be thrown away, given the other !same_type_p check (that one is
>> needed because adjust_temp_type can't deal with that), at least
>> when I remove that
>> GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26 make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp='constexpr-dtor* pr114426.C constexpr-111284.C constexpr-lifetime7.C'"
>> still passes.
>
> I've now tested that version and it passed bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux
> and i686-linux. But as I said earlier, trying to tweak the patch further
> doesn't work on the constexpr-dtor{5,6}.C tests.
OK.
> 2024-04-23 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/111284
> * constexpr.cc (cxx_bind_parameters_in_call): For PARM_DECLs with
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE types use vc_glvalue rather than vc_prvalue for
> cxx_eval_constant_expression and if it doesn't have the same
> type as it should, cast the reference type to reference to type
> before convert_from_reference and instead of adjust_temp_type
> take address of the arg, cast to reference to type and then
> convert_from_reference.
> (cxx_eval_constant_expression) <case PARM_DECL>: For lval case
> on parameters with TREE_ADDRESSABLE types lookup result in
> ctx->globals if possible. Otherwise if lookup in ctx->globals
> was successful for parameter with TREE_ADDRESSABLE type,
> recurse with vc_prvalue on the returned value.
>
> * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-111284.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-lifetime7.C: Expect one error on a different
> line.
>
> --- gcc/cp/constexpr.cc.jj 2024-02-13 10:29:57.979155641 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/constexpr.cc 2024-03-07 19:35:01.032412221 +0100
> @@ -1877,13 +1877,18 @@ cxx_bind_parameters_in_call (const const
> x = build_address (x);
> }
> if (TREE_ADDRESSABLE (type))
> - /* Undo convert_for_arg_passing work here. */
> - x = convert_from_reference (x);
> - /* Normally we would strip a TARGET_EXPR in an initialization context
> - such as this, but here we do the elision differently: we keep the
> - TARGET_EXPR, and use its CONSTRUCTOR as the value of the parm. */
> - arg = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, x, vc_prvalue,
> - non_constant_p, overflow_p);
> + {
> + /* Undo convert_for_arg_passing work here. */
> + x = convert_from_reference (x);
> + arg = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, x, vc_glvalue,
> + non_constant_p, overflow_p);
> + }
> + else
> + /* Normally we would strip a TARGET_EXPR in an initialization context
> + such as this, but here we do the elision differently: we keep the
> + TARGET_EXPR, and use its CONSTRUCTOR as the value of the parm. */
> + arg = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, x, vc_prvalue,
> + non_constant_p, overflow_p);
> /* Check we aren't dereferencing a null pointer when calling a non-static
> member function, which is undefined behaviour. */
> if (i == 0 && DECL_OBJECT_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fun)
> @@ -1909,7 +1914,16 @@ cxx_bind_parameters_in_call (const const
> {
> /* Make sure the binding has the same type as the parm. But
> only for constant args. */
> - if (!TYPE_REF_P (type))
> + if (TREE_ADDRESSABLE (type))
> + {
> + if (!same_type_p (type, TREE_TYPE (arg)))
> + {
> + arg = build_fold_addr_expr (arg);
> + arg = cp_fold_convert (build_reference_type (type), arg);
> + arg = convert_from_reference (arg);
> + }
> + }
> + else if (!TYPE_REF_P (type))
> arg = adjust_temp_type (type, arg);
> if (!TREE_CONSTANT (arg))
> *non_constant_args = true;
> @@ -7499,9 +7513,19 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const cons
>
> case PARM_DECL:
> if (lval && !TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (t)))
> - /* glvalue use. */;
> + {
> + /* glvalue use. */
> + if (TREE_ADDRESSABLE (TREE_TYPE (t)))
> + if (tree v = ctx->global->get_value (t))
> + r = v;
> + }
> else if (tree v = ctx->global->get_value (t))
> - r = v;
> + {
> + r = v;
> + if (TREE_ADDRESSABLE (TREE_TYPE (t)))
> + r = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, r, vc_prvalue,
> + non_constant_p, overflow_p);
> + }
> else if (lval)
> /* Defer in case this is only used for its type. */;
> else if (ctx->global->is_outside_lifetime (t))
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-111284.C.jj 2024-03-07 16:27:48.113651999 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-111284.C 2024-03-07 16:26:49.565466606 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +// PR c++/111284
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> +
> +struct S {
> + S () = default;
> + constexpr S (const S &) noexcept : s{this} {}
> + constexpr S & operator= (const S &) noexcept { return *this; }
> + constexpr bool foo () const noexcept { return s == this; }
> + S *s = this;
> +};
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +bar (S x) noexcept
> +{
> + return x.foo ();
> +}
> +
> +static_assert (bar (S {}), "");
> +static_assert ([] (S x) { return x.foo (); } (S {}), "");
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-lifetime7.C.jj 2023-12-13 19:09:33.252657826 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-lifetime7.C 2024-03-07 19:49:49.342334090 +0100
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ constexpr bool n1 = test_access<NonTrivi
> constexpr bool n2 = test_modification<NonTrivial>(); // { dg-message "in .constexpr." "" { target c++20 } }
> constexpr bool n3 = test_scope<NonTrivial>(); // { dg-message "in .constexpr." "" { target c++20 } }
> constexpr bool n4 = test_destroy_temp<NonTrivial>(); // { dg-message "in .constexpr." "" { target c++20 } }
> -constexpr bool n5 = test_parameter(NonTrivial{}); // { dg-error "destroying" "" { target c++20 } }
> +constexpr bool n5 = test_parameter(NonTrivial{}); // { dg-message "in .constexpr." "" { target c++20 } }
> constexpr bool n6 = test_bindings<NonTrivial>();
> #endif
>
>
>
> Jakub
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 8:56 [PATCH] c++: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-03-25 18:27 ` C++ Patch ping Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-12 19:05 ` [PATCH] c++: Fix constexpr evaluation of parameters passed by invisible reference [PR111284] Jason Merrill
2024-04-15 12:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-23 15:52 ` [PATCH] c++, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-25 18:38 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45e52f2a-113c-4e7f-a491-5fff76041d17@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).