From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12913 invoked by alias); 24 May 2007 15:38:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 12905 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2007 15:38:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 15:38:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4OFaflh031431; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:41 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4OFact0015608; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:39 -0400 Received: from touchme.toronto.redhat.com (IDENT:postfix@touchme.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.9]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4OFabkk018451; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:38 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.106] (to-dhcp6.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.106]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C79800087; Thu, 24 May 2007 11:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4655B108.9030209@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 15:42:00 -0000 From: Jeff Johnston User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Ellcey Cc: bonzini@gnu.org, libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm, newlib@sourceware.org, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and Src trees References: <200705241515.IAA06579@hpsje.cup.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <200705241515.IAA06579@hpsje.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg01621.txt.bz2 Steve Ellcey wrote: >> libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2007 09:40:56 +0200, "Paolo Bonzini" said: >>> >>>> Ok as soon as the gcc PR32009 is solved, which should be one day or two. >>>> This will also give some time to complain to the gdb/binutils/newlib >>>> people. >>>> >>> Given >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009#c9 >>> >> Yes, go on. >> >> Paolo >> > > Just to make sure, Jeff are you OK with the newlib part of this patch? > I think you said you were but I don't want to change the configure.in > and Makefile.am files in newlib without being positive you are on board > with the change too. These changes are the ones created by Charles > Wilson. > > Steve Ellcey > sje@cup.hp.com > I don't remember seeing the actual patch. This is the one proposed that does not use libtool unless we ask for it so it was definitely my preference. IIRC, the proposal was to change the way we set up libtool and it added a few macros prior to the check for libtool-used. If that is correct, there should be no problem. -- Jeff J.