From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13275 invoked by alias); 24 May 2007 20:01:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 13263 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2007 20:01:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail1.panix.com (HELO mail1.panix.com) (166.84.1.72) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2007 20:01:25 +0000 Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021DB58AC2; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:01:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.60] (pool-70-104-128-175.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [70.104.128.175]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29C316977; Thu, 24 May 2007 16:01:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4655EF12.6060605@naturalbridge.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:02:00 -0000 From: Kenneth Zadeck User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Schmidt CC: gcc-patches , Steven Bosscher , "Park, Seongbae" , "Bonzini, Paolo" , Serge Belyshev , richard.earnshaw@arm.com, echristo@apple.com, "Pinski, Andrew" , "Weigand, Ulrich" , Ian Lance Taylor , "Edelsohn, David" , "Berlin, Daniel" Subject: Re: dataflow branch merging plans. References: <46543F49.8060104@naturalbridge.com> <46557380.9060105@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <46557380.9060105@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg01644.txt.bz2 Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > >> I believe that the dataflow branch is now ready to merge into the >> mainline. We have fixed almost all of the performance problems >> associated with it. While there are still some left, we feel >> confident that these can be addressed during the rest of stage I and >> during stage II. >> > > Vlad's last benchmark run still showed up to 11% compile time > regression, didn't it? > > > Bernd > The ia-64 is an outlier at 11% as is the ppc at .9%. I think that it is quite likely that there is some ia-64 unique pass, like one of the schedulers, that needs a look at. This will be addressed after the merge. Kenny