From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5431 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2007 08:04:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 5419 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2007 08:04:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:04:38 +0000 Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861D0217E5; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:04:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46A855C4.5000709@suse.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:06:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Doug Gregor , GCC Patches , Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: PING: C++0x decltype patch References: <24b520d20707251228m32ccd1bcs6af46b72c0598238@mail.gmail.com> <46A85238.3090902@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg01887.txt.bz2 Andrew Pinski wrote: > I don't think it is the community is not supporting it but it is just > we are all busy with other things. We all have our own issues we are > trying to solve. Though I will admit the C++ front-end is not being > looked after like it should be but I don't have a solution for it. I see your point. Maybe we just need additional maintainers? For example, if you ask me, I consider Doug definitely able to tell if a new C++0x feature is risky wrt the existing C++03 implementation. That means, I would suggest a new C++0x-maintainer role for Doug. Paolo.