From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7515 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2007 22:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 7507 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2007 22:35:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:35:31 +0000 Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF7121959; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46A921DF.20202@suse.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:17:00 -0000 From: Paolo Carlini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Mitchell Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32108 References: <46960B4C.6070407@suse.de> <469C45D2.8060508@codesourcery.com> <46A71AD2.8090404@suse.de> <46A91BD6.4090902@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <46A91BD6.4090902@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg01954.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell wrote: >>Yes, I see what you mean, at some point I was figuring out a specific >>error message. Then, frankly, noticed that the C front-end was rejecting >>it with a similar error and decided to post the simple patch. >> >> >I still think we should do better, using the approach I suggested above. >If that turns out to be hard, we can fall back to your simpler patch. > > Sure, no problem. Thanks, Paolo.