* [PATCH]: Fix two XPASS regressions on m68k
@ 2007-08-14 8:18 Maxim Kuvyrkov
2007-08-15 4:16 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Kuvyrkov @ 2007-08-14 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Jeff Law, Andreas Schwab
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]
Hello,
I've noticed two XPASS regressions - sibcall-3.c & sibcall-4.c - on
m68k. The tests are marked XFAIL for m68k-*-* and bunch of other
architectures with the comment that those targets don't have a sibcall
pattern. Well, m68k has one, so these tests should no longer XFAIL on m68k.
Will commit as obvious if no one objects.
Thanks,
Maxim
[-- Attachment #2: xpass-1.ChangeLog --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 137 bytes --]
2007-08-13 Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>
* gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c: Remove m68k from XFAIL list.
* gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c: Ditto.
[-- Attachment #3: xpass-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1664 bytes --]
--- gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c (revision 178844)
+++ gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c (revision 178845)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation Inc.
Contributed by Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> */
-/* { dg-do run { xfail { { arc-*-* avr-*-* c4x-*-* cris-*-* h8300-*-* hppa*64*-*-* m32r-*-* m68hc1?-*-* m681?-*-* m680*-*-* m68k-*-* mcore-*-* mn10300-*-* xstormy16-*-* v850*-*-* vax-*-* xtensa-*-* } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm32 } } } } } */
+/* { dg-do run { xfail { { arc-*-* avr-*-* c4x-*-* cris-*-* h8300-*-* hppa*64*-*-* m32r-*-* m68hc1?-*-* mcore-*-* mn10300-*-* xstormy16-*-* v850*-*-* vax-*-* xtensa-*-* } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm32 } } } } } */
/* -mlongcall disables sibcall patterns. */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mlongcall" } { "" } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
--- gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c (revision 178844)
+++ gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c (revision 178845)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation Inc.
Contributed by Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> */
-/* { dg-do run { xfail { { arc-*-* avr-*-* c4x-*-* cris-*-* h8300-*-* hppa*64*-*-* m32r-*-* m68hc1?-*-* m681?-*-* m680*-*-* m68k-*-* mcore-*-* mn10300-*-* xstormy16-*-* v850*-*-* vax-*-* xtensa-*-* } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm32 } } } } } */
+/* { dg-do run { xfail { { arc-*-* avr-*-* c4x-*-* cris-*-* h8300-*-* hppa*64*-*-* m32r-*-* m68hc1?-*-* mcore-*-* mn10300-*-* xstormy16-*-* v850*-*-* vax-*-* xtensa-*-* } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm32 } } } } } */
/* -mlongcall disables sibcall patterns. */
/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-* } { "-mlongcall" } { "" } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -foptimize-sibling-calls" } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH]: Fix two XPASS regressions on m68k
2007-08-14 8:18 [PATCH]: Fix two XPASS regressions on m68k Maxim Kuvyrkov
@ 2007-08-15 4:16 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Maxim Kuvyrkov @ 2007-08-15 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Jeff Law, Andreas Schwab
Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed two XPASS regressions - sibcall-3.c & sibcall-4.c - on
> m68k. The tests are marked XFAIL for m68k-*-* and bunch of other
> architectures with the comment that those targets don't have a sibcall
> pattern. Well, m68k has one, so these tests should no longer XFAIL on
> m68k.
>
> Will commit as obvious if no one objects.
Checked in.
--
Maxim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-15 4:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-14 8:18 [PATCH]: Fix two XPASS regressions on m68k Maxim Kuvyrkov
2007-08-15 4:16 ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).