From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6415 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2007 08:35:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 6085 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2007 08:35:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:34:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 14664 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2007 08:34:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.44.101?) (nathan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Aug 2007 08:34:57 -0000 Message-ID: <46CBF51E.7070409@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:36:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@codesourcery.com, richard@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] Remove strcmp-1.c XFAIL References: <871webb5el.fsf@firetop.home> <87fy2cxb8x.fsf@firetop.home> In-Reply-To: <87fy2cxb8x.fsf@firetop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg01425.txt.bz2 Richard Sandiford wrote: > Ping > > Richard Sandiford writes: >> Earlier versions of the VxWorks kernel's strcmp function used signed >> rather than unsigned comparisons. This problem has been fixed in recent >> versions (6.5 and 6.6), so is it OK to remove the XFAIL? Tested on >> i586-wrs-vxworks, mips-wrs-vxworks, sh-wrs-vxworks and sparc-wrs-vxworks. >> >> Richard >> >> >> gcc/testsuite/ >> * gcc.c-torture/execute/strcmp-1.x: Delete. ok -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery