From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27994 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2007 21:42:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27939 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:42:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 19871 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2007 21:42:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 24 Aug 2007 21:42:22 -0000 Message-ID: <46CF50BD.5010708@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:06:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sandra Loosemore CC: GCC Patches , Nigel Stephens , Guy Morrogh , David Ung , Thiemo Seufer , richard@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: PATCH: fine-tuning for can_store_by_pieces References: <46C3343A.5080407@codesourcery.com> <87ps1nop2x.fsf@firetop.home> <46C778D6.5060808@codesourcery.com> <87y7g6r50c.fsf@firetop.home> <46CA222D.2050107@codesourcery.com> <87ps1h5mda.fsf@firetop.home> <46CAEBCE.3050807@codesourcery.com> <87r6lx3r9p.fsf@firetop.home> <46CB4B99.5010501@codesourcery.com> <87zm0k39gj.fsf@firetop.home> <46CD9828.3040305@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <46CD9828.3040305@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg01690.txt.bz2 Sandra Loosemore wrote: > Mark, could you take another look at this as well, since I included > Richard's suggested change to remove the optimize_size check from the > target-independent code in builtins.c? The target-independent changes look fine. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713